Four bibliographic databases were searched from date of inception to May 2023 (PubMed, EBSCOhost CINAHL, Ovid APA PsycINFO, Scopus). Initial searches were run in Oct 2018 and search updates were run in May 2023. Searches were also run in Google Scholar. To ensure comprehensive coverage, a health sciences librarian (blinded) designed the PubMed search strategy and then adapted that search strategy for use in other databases. The search strings utilized a combination of natural language and, where applicable, controlled vocabulary to cover the concepts of “technology” and “family or domestic violence.” In instances where possible, the search results were limited to articles published in the English language. The full list of search strings from different databases is shown in Table 1.

In this article, abuse that could happen in a household setting in the United States, including child abuse, IPV and elder abuse, regardless of the relationship between survivors and perpetrators will be considered as DV. Specifically, DV can occur between a parent and child, or siblings, while IPV can only occur between romantic partners who may or may not be living together in the same household.

The inclusion criteria include 1) health information technology interventions applied 2) women with DV experiences (including IPV, child abuse and elder abuse) 3) published between January 2008 and May 2023. Studies related to dating violence and social media were excluded because the settings could be out of the household in the United States. Editorials, commentaries, non-peer reviewed articles, study protocols, conference abstracts, and non-English articles were also excluded.

In the initial phase (Figure 1), articles were assessed based on their titles and abstracts, specifically examining their relevance to technology interventions for DV. Articles did not include women, or not conducted in the United States were not retrieved. Subsequently, in the second stage, full-text documents were obtained and subjected to qualitative review, guided by inclusion criteria. Prior to screening, a training session was conducted where reviewers evaluated a set of sample records together. A 75% inter-rater agreement was achieved among reviewers on this initial set before proceeding to the formal screening. During the formal screening, two independent reviewers examined the titles and abstracts of the records and categorized them as “included,” “excluded” or “uncertain” based on the relevancy to HIT interventions for DV. The reasons for exclusions include not related to HIT intervention, review articles, or any commentary articles. For any uncertain records, a senior researcher (BLINDED) resolved the status of the record.

Two reviewers independently charted data from each eligible articles. Any disagreements were resolved through group discussions or adjudication by a third author. The variables in the spreadsheet were organized into three categories: 1) classification of the intervention (including study purpose, technology, type of intervention, and abuse), 2) descriptive details (such as sample size, location, and settings), and 3) intervention outcomes (including physical safety, psychological, and technological outcomes). This scoping review followed the guidelines from Arksey and O’Malley [24].

Seven web-based interventions were identified; five of them collected data from a stand-alone website [25–29]. Four online trainings were designed for multidisciplinary healthcare professionals [30–33]. Five studies leveraged mobile devices to provide intervention [34–38]. Two studies used email as an intervention tool [31, 39]. Another two studies used Global Positioning System (GPS) as interventions [40, 41]. One article used videoconferencing as intervention [42], and another study utilized simulation technology to tackle domestic violence [30].

Four studies focused on prevention [25–27, 42], and ten focused on education [28, 30–33, 37, 39, 43–45]. Five studies delineated the effectiveness of HIT intervention [34, 40, 41, 46, 47] and three focused on various types of DV assessment [29, 35, 48]. Only one study emphasized screening for patients [36].

Different types of DV survivors or potential survivors were captured in this review, such as adolescent mothers [36], abused women [27, 42], pregnant women [25, 46], and battered women [47]. Simultaneously, participants were extended to various professions like nurses [30], physicians [31], dental students [32], and law enforcement officers [34]. Among twenty-four studies, the sample sizes were ranged from 11 to 1,869. The sample characteristics and demographics were diversified. The majority of studies recruited participants from designated clinical settings (e.g., hospitals, clinics), community centers (e.g., non-governmental organizations, shelters), schools, and criminal justice services departments. A mean age of 7–40 was found across studies.

The review studies include people of diverse ethnic backgrounds, including Whites, African Americans, Hispanic Latinos, Asians, and others; however, the samples were predominantly White (N = 13). Only one article was conducted in rural areas [48] compared to fourteen articles in metropolitan areas [26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 35–37, 39, 43–47]. Another five articles have been discussed domestic violence in both metropolitan and rural areas [28, 38, 40–42].

Four types of abuse were included. Twelve studies focused on intimate partner violence (IPV) [25–27, 30–33, 38, 39, 43, 46, 47], six highlighted child abuse [29, 34–36, 45, 48], four illustrated DV [28, 40–42], and two studies targeted on elder abuse [37, 44].

Various research methods are used, including randomized controlled trials (N = 5) [26–28, 43, 46], and longitudinal (N = 1) [36], mixed methods (N = 5) [29, 33, 37–39], feasibility tests (N = 5) [25, 30, 34, 40, 44], non-equivalent group design (N = 1) [45], quasi-experimental design (N = 1) [32], as well as qualitative studies (N = 1) [41].

Our results highlight that HIT interventions focused on different types of abuse within families, with Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) being the most common and elder abuse being the least. Research has demonstrated that young and educated people were the population group more willing to accept and adopt HIT interventions in clinical and community settings, while older adults staying at home were unwilling to use these health interventions due to perceived barriers, such as inertia, cognitive impairment, and physical disabilities [49, 50]. However, this situation might decline because of aging and the rise of computer literacy among the elderly. According to Internet World Statistics, over 89 percent of the U.S. population were internet users in 2019 [51]. The web-literate population has been growing and constantly surging with the increasing reliance on technology, machine learning, and artificial intelligence in our daily lives. Fleming (2015) delineated that over 60% of people older than 50 used technologies to browse social networking sites, take photos, and communicate in text messages [52]. Although those older than 65 may have more perceived barriers to using health technology, such as hearing deficit and cognitive impairment, they will accept new technologies when the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. There has been a proliferation of research concerning the utilization of technology in addressing elder abuse, highlighting its significant feasibility, accessibility, and effectiveness in monitoring neglect or physiological changes among elder abuse survivors, both at home and in clinical settings [53]. Therefore, it is anticipated that computer literacy and the implementation of HIT interventions among the elderly will continue to grow, leading to the expansion of interventions targeting aging in the forthcoming decades.

The findings of our study also revealed that the use of HIT had been employed to assist DV survivors residing in both urban and rural settings. Due to limited access to healthcare services, women residing in rural areas experiencing DV face difficulties in effectively addressing their DV situation [54]. Previously, individuals from rural areas who were DV survivors may not have benefitted from technological advancements and treatments due to the inadequate support available to them [54]. However, our review demonstrates that digital devices in rural areas hold promise for telemedicine, providing an interactive means of delivering care, making referrals, and offering diagnosis and screening for DV survivors who may be able to meet healthcare professionals physically in a clinic or hospital. As the digital literacy rate has consistently improved over the past decade, it is expected that the limitations of technical support (such as limited wireless devices, unstable Internet, and restricted access to technical assistance) are no longer hindrances to implementing HIT interventions in rural areas. The current body of research has explored the utilization of videoconferencing, interventions pertaining to medical appointments, counseling services, and danger assessments, all of which should be expanded to rural areas through digital platforms or means. It is anticipated that the utilization of teleconferencing and online counseling services will become even more prominent, as indicated by the expanding coverage of health insurance plans for online services and consultations that aimed at addressing the mental health needs of women with DV experiences.

The utilization of web-based interventions has emerged as a growing trend in DV prevention and education. HIT offers several advantages, including convenience, interactive design, and the creation of an anonymous environment facilitated by the Internet. Given that DV survivors may be reluctant to engage in face-to-face social interactions due to fear of stigmatization, shame, guilt, and judgment [16], web-based interventions provide an anonymous platform that encourages survivors to disclose their traumatic experiences more vividly and seek help proactively. It is well-documented that the sense of anonymity and social distance feeling created by the online platform fosters candid, sensitive and traumatic conversations [55, 56]. It is noteworthy that effective patient-provider communication remains the linchpin of positive intervention outcomes, particularly when addressing sensitive topics such as DV. Technological advancements promise to promote truthful or effective communication between DV survivors and healthcare professionals.

While utilizing technology for DV was predominantly applied at the patient level, the application also extends to healthcare professionals’ training. Previous literature highlighted the lack of training provided for healthcare providers to screen DV cases, thereby weakening their ability to probe DV questions and the lack of empathic listening skills during consultations. As such, DV survivors easily suffer from delayed treatment or referral from physicians [57]. For future endeavors, DV training development can extend the targeted participants to more healthcare professionals who might be poorly equipped, such as new nursing staff, social workers, or counselors during the orientation program.

HIT interventions have evaluated physical safety and psychological outcomes of women with DV experience. For instance, technology-based interventionshave heightened the awareness of safety strategies among women with DV experience, strengthening their sense of security and capacity to defend themselves from perpetrators within their households [27]. Mobile applications and online training programs have evaluated the current danger level for women, thereby increasing their prompt recognition and engagement in modifying their safety strategies [25]. By leveraging the use of technology, women can actively participate in reassessing their danger level and adapting their contingency plans [27]. They feel safer and find it easier to evaluate their situation on their smartphone [35]. Moreover, online platforms, emails, and messaging systems could reduce the risk of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among women experiencing DV [25, 39]. Technology provides a valuable platform for women to share and discuss their experiences with other survivors, aligning with previous research indicating that computer-based interventions can significantly improve social support, self-efficacy, and alleviate feelings of loneliness among rural women [58]. Consequently, HIT interventions can contribute to developing a stronger social support network for women facing DV.

There is a wealth of evidence showing the importance of emotional health towards women with DV experiences. However, our review indicated limited HIT intervention studies on assessing the emotional aspects of survivors’ experiences. For example, World Health Organization (WHO) demonstrated that women with IPV experience could have a higher demand for mental health services and an increased likelihood of psychological distress [59]. Women could experience emotional breakdown easier or the need to express themselves after traumatic experiences like DV. The anonymity and instant communication facilitated by mobile devices and the Internet, have provided opportunities for women to seek emotional support through texting through online platforms [60, 61]. This avenue enables better adaptations and enhances the quality of life following traumatic experiences caused by abusive relationships. Future HIT research endeavors could focus on improving the emotional status of survivors, thus promoting more favorable mental health outcomes.

Despite the positive outcomes reported in the literature, adopting HIT interventions for DV population is not without demerits. Several articles have delineated the limitations of using a technical device across community, clinical, and household settings [62, 63]. With reference to the power and control theory of DV, Baddam (2017) believes that the use of technology may exacerbate DV conditions as perpetrators can install tracker applications with GPS and blame the survivors for concealing the DV-related on their smartphones [64]. Perpetrators can turn out to be digital stalkers and constitute a significant threat to the victim, thereby permanently menacing psychological harm to the victim’s life [65].

HIT interventions have predominantly focused on raising awareness and building a digital platform for women to communicate. However, the evaluation of most interventions has typically been limited to pre-and post-test assessments, without consistently tracking long-term performance across multiple time points, such as 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up. Besides, existing research weights physical wellbeing higher than emotional wellbeing. There is currently no standardized measurement for assessing emotions via technology. It is suggested that incorporating advanced machine learning data analytics could be beneficial in extracting emotional needs and delivering emotional support through virtual messaging, such as natural language processing. Further research can capitalize on data analytics to develop an emotional terminology dictionary (e.g., terms related to resilience or distress) that provides a measurable benchmark for extracting and systematically quantifying emotional text data (Table 4).

Furthermore, it is important to direct future research avenues towards conducting phase II and III randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the preliminary effect size, side effects, and efficacy of the technology within a specific context. The majority of studies reviewed primarily focused on intervention design, feasibility, and prototype intervention. The subsequent step should involve an initial test of intervention in comparison with an appropriate alternative option. To identify outcomes and determine whether the measurement tools can detect the anticipated changes, a small sample size of 40–60 randomized controlled trials should be conducted, enabling the calculation of effect sizes for the intervention [66]. Future research can assess technological interventions by RCT in multiple settings or within a targeted setting to evaluate the efficacy.

This review also provides clinical insights into the context and environment of DV technology interventions. There are abundant web-based interventions, supported by theoretical and empirical evidence of their efficacy and feasibility, to raise awareness, enhance knowledge, and evaluate the specific needs of survivors. The utilization of web-based interventions in outpatient departments, prenatal or postnatal clinics, and home visits yield greater effectiveness compared to other settings. Moreover, existing literature highlights the importance of prioritizing victim’s needs during family conflict. Healthcare providers should be well-informed and trained in addressing the common application procedures and criteria for DV shelter, safety planning, law protection, and childcare through technology (i.e., online training, and case study from online).

The resolution of this public health concern necessitates the implementation of policy modifications or reforms. From a policy standpoint, it is crucial to facilitate the translation of research findings into practical applications in clinical and community settings. In accordance with the socioecological model, the prevention of DV should involve interventions targeting individuals, interpersonal relationships, societal structures, and community dynamics. The government and other relevant stakeholders should join forces and support to violence prevention research endeavors. Additionally, it is recommended to allocate increased funding towards research and innovative technologies to enhance the provision of nursing care and social services through technological interventions. Furthermore, the government should formulate policies to foster an atmosphere of harmony, respect, and amicability within families, workplaces, and communities.

Studies included in this review have methodological considerations regarding the sample size, demographic characteristics, and design that should be noted with caution. Our included studies generally with small sample size, with several studies even being characterized as pilot or exploratory studies. Although the geographical settings from our studies include rural, suburban, urban, clinical, and community areas, the demographic characteristics still predominantly comprise a white population, which affected the overall generalizability of this study. Given the inconsistent reporting of study location among studies, we categorized them as either metropolitan or rural areas based on the current metrics from the U.S. Census Bureau (2016) [67]. Notably, only four studies took place in rural areas; future research should strive to clarify the definition or characteristics of locations where the interventions were conducted. Also, this review did not capture which forms of abuse were experienced by the DV survivors, which could influence the adherence to HIT intervention. We accept this trade-off for this scoping review as the adherence data was not provided in most of the studies. To maintain consistency and precise comparison in the analysis, this review specifically excluded dating violence, and articles using social media to collect data for DV. Therefore, it is possible that certain HIT interventions in DV populations were missed from this review.

By and large, DV remains a significant public health issue characterized by repetitive trauma within a vicious cycle, especially in the United States. This review highlights the current scope of HIT interventions in addressing DV. Our synthesized literature demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in intervention modalities, target populations, as well as study designs. HIT interventions offer an opportunity to reach potential survivors from underserved rural and suburban areas where access to healthcare services and DV support may be limited. Moreover, the range of HIT interventions for DV encompasses interventions at the patient and provider levels. Implementing online training modules for multidisciplinary healthcare practitioners shows promise in improving outcomes, as demonstrated by pre- and post-intervention assessments. While not all physical health outcomes were measured, the findings emphasize technology’s immense potential in reaching a broader and more heterogeneous sample base. Leveraging HIT can support DV survivors across individuals, families, and communities.