Skip to main content


Public Health Rev, 16 March 2022

The Role of Europe’s Schools of Public Health in Times of War: ASPHER Statement on the War Against Ukraine

Lisa WandschneiderLisa Wandschneider1Yudit NamerYudit Namer1Nadav DavidovitchNadav Davidovitch2Dorit NitzanDorit Nitzan2Robert OtokRobert Otok3Lore LeightonLore Leighton3Carlo SignorelliCarlo Signorelli3John MiddletonJohn Middleton3Jose M. Martin-Moreno,Jose M. Martin-Moreno4,5Laurent ChambaudLaurent Chambaud6Henrique LopesHenrique Lopes7Oliver Razum
Oliver Razum1*
  • 1Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  • 2School of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
  • 3The Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER), Brussels, Belgium
  • 4ASPHER Honours’ Committee, Brussels, Belgium
  • 5Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Medical School and INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • 6EHESP School of Public Health, Rennes, France
  • 7Public Health Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal

War has devastating impacts on the health of populations. The consequences of war are multidimensional, affecting social life and health infrastructure, as well as environmental health. Along with immediate and long-term effects on the physical and mental health of all those involved, the consequences of war have the greatest impacts on vulnerable and marginalised groups [13]. In addition, war and armed conflicts forcibly displace people, creating additional public health problems throughout the displacement, flight and/or migration trajectory. The Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER) reminds the attacking military of their obligation to the United Nations’ Humanitarian Law and WHO Resolution on Attacks on Health Care [4] that aims at ensuring that essential life-saving health services, including public health, are provided to emergency-affected populations unhindered by any form of violence or obstruction.

Public Health defaults to a pro-peace approach as ASPHER has outlined before in position papers relating to events such as the rights abuses in Turkey towards medical professionals following their stand against a military operation in Afrin [5, 6], the Israel-Palestine conflict [7], and the role of Schools of Public Health (SPHs) in peacebuilding [8]. Accordingly, ASPHER strongly condemns the military action against Ukraine that has claimed human lives and destroyed civilian infrastructure. We stand in solidarity with the Ukrainian people as well as with dissenting Russian citizens who object to this military aggression. ASPHER expresses its deepest concern about the impact of the war on the health and wellbeing of the Ukrainian people and other potential victims, as well as European and international society.

Schools of Public Health are entities capable of supporting civil society with critical skills and competences during conflict. In addition, SPHs are a major partner to national and international health organisations. ASPHER, as a network representing SPHs and public health training institutions in Europe for over 50 years, takes a stand as a credible source of expertise, solidarity, support and allyship for SPHs and the public health workforce of all affected countries. Guided by the principles for peacebuilding [8], ASPHER takes the following five-fold action:

(1) Discovery and dissemination of facts: ASPHER is creating an easily accessible mapping of knowledge, competences and skills that are of importance for SPHs and the public health workforce under conditions of conflict and war. Among them are emergency response and operations including environmental and infrastructure-related issues; public health surveillance and reporting systems in conflict zones; refugee and migrant health; the management of the Covid-19 pandemic [9]; other communicable diseases that emerge due to destruction of infrastructure; coordinated efforts with military personnel for public health interests; review protocols and competencies on radiation emergencies, nuclear explosion or nuclear leaks and how to protect population health in such eventualities. To support the effective implementation of these competencies and skills, ASPHER strengthens the existing cooperation in the SPH network, namely through sharing in scientific cooperation programmes, exchanges of scholars, distance learning and other forms of emergency digital training, assistance and scientific advice to health authorities, policymakers and other national or European or international entities, such as the United Nations Health Cluster in Ukraine.

(2) Diplomacy, mediation, and conflict transformation: ASPHER has started and will continue to mobilise and connect SPHs and public health colleagues from war-affected and neighbouring areas to help maintain dialogue between SPHs for an effective and appropriate response to public health challenges. In addition, ASPHER will give space to voices from inside Ukraine and people most affected by the military action to share their experiences through the Association’s communication channels, e.g., monthly newsletters and social media platforms.

(3) Solidarity and support: Specific attention will be paid to mobilisation of practical support networks for Ukrainians and residents of Ukraine. Firstly, this includes hosting scholars and students at risk in ASPHER member schools. ASPHER takes an active role in connecting affected scholars, facilitating exchange with SPHs that have experience in hosting researchers at risk and providing resources on potential partnering organisations (e.g., Scholars At Risk, Scholar Rescue Fund, CARA in the United Kingdom, Philipp Schwartz Initiative in Germany, PAUSE in France). Secondly, ASPHER will mobilise its substantial expertise in refugee health to support states that are likely to receive large numbers of refugees, potentially for an extended period of time. Such efforts will also include standing in solidarity with vocal peace activists in Russia.

(4) Use of health-related superordinate goals: Active monitoring and documenting human rights violations with probable consequence of ill health and stunting.

(5) Dissent and non-cooperation: ASPHER reiterates its position that it will stand against any activities undermining peacebuilding and will not cooperate with institutions that are associated with rights violations.

To effectively coordinate these actions, ASPHER has decided to create a task force1 monitoring public health impacts in Ukraine aiming to provide a solid foundation for prevention, preparedness and response to armed conflict.

Taking these actions is a natural continuation of ASPHER’s mission to promote “healthy and peaceful societies” based on the values of social accountability and health equity. Framing the situation within public health thinking broadens attention beyond immediate medical and humanitarian aspects of the conflict. Though extremely important, they are not enough. Social, economic and environmental determinants of health must be addressed to form a One Health sustainable response, strengthening local capacities with sensitivity to local communities’ needs. ASPHER calls on our members, partners, allies and networks to support these actions and join our efforts with the ultimate goal of an effective public health response to the war against Ukraine.

Editorial Note

ASPHER is responsible and liable for the content. The statement was approved by an Editor-in-Chief but not externally peer reviewed.

The Global Network for Academic Public Health (GNAPH) endoreses the ASPHER statement. The Global Network is an alliance of the regional associations that represent schools and programs of public health around the world, including ASPHER.

Translated versions will be made available from:

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


ASPHER would like to acknowledge and thank all colleagues who contributed to the development of this statement.


1The task force is open to all ASPHER member schools. Please contact ASPHER secretariat at if representative(s) of your institution wish to contribute.


1. Sheather, J. As Russian Troops Cross into Ukraine, We Need to Remind Ourselves of the Impact of War on Health. BMJ (2022) 376:o499. doi:10.1136/bmj.o499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Levy, BS, and Sidel, VW. War and Public Health. Oxford University Press (2008). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311181.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Levy, BS, and Sidel, VW. Documenting the Effects of Armed Conflict on Population Health. Annu Rev Public Health (2016) 37:205–18. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021913

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4.World Health Organization. World Health Assembly Resolution 65.20: WHO’s Response, and Role as the Health Cluster lead. In: Meeting the Growing Demands of Health in Humanitarian Emergencies. Geneva (2012). Retrieved from (Accessed February 28, 2022).

Google Scholar

5. Razum, O, Barros, H, Buckingham, R, Codd, M, Czabanowska, K, Künzli, N, et al. Is War a Man-Made Public Health Problem? Lancet (2019) 394(10209):1613. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31900-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6.The Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER). ASPHER Considers War as a “Man-made Public Health Problem” (2019). Available at: (Accessed February 28, 2022).

Google Scholar

7. Middleton, J. ASPHER President’s Message - a Bridge for Peace. The Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER) (2021). Available at:,4,118.html. (Accessed February 28, 2022).

Google Scholar

8. Namer, Y, Wandschneider, L, Middleton, J, Davidovitch, N, and Razum, O. How Can Schools of Public Health Actively Promote Peace? Public Health Rev (2021) 42:1604459. doi:10.3389/phrs.2021.1604459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Quinn, VJ, Dhabalia, TJ, Roslycky, LL, Wilson, VJ, Hansen, JC, Hulchiy, O, et al. COVID-19 at War: The Joint Forces Operation in Ukraine. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness (2021) 1:1–8. doi:10.1017/dmp.2021.88

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: public health, war, ASPHER, Ukraine, healthy and peaceful societies

Citation: Wandschneider L, Namer Y, Davidovitch N, Nitzan D, Otok R, Leighton L, Signorelli C, Middleton J, Martin-Moreno JM, Chambaud L, Lopes H and Razum O (2022) The Role of Europe’s Schools of Public Health in Times of War: ASPHER Statement on the War Against Ukraine. Public Health Rev 43:1604880. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604880

Received: 01 March 2022; Accepted: 02 March 2022;
Published: 16 March 2022.

Approved by:

Kasia Czabanowska, Maastricht University, Netherlands

Copyright © 2022 Wandschneider, Namer, Davidovitch, Nitzan, Otok, Leighton, Signorelli, Middleton, Martin-Moreno, Chambaud, Lopes and Razum. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PHR is edited by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) in a partnership with the Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region (ASPHER)+

*Correspondence: Oliver Razum,

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.