REVIEW

Public Health Rev.

Defining competencies for policymaking in public health: A scoping review on the state-of-the-art

  • 1. Universitat Bremen, Bremen, Germany

  • 2. Institute of Government and Public Policy (IGOP), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • 3. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

This study examines the competencies required for effective public health policymaking, seeking to clarify the range of knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary across the policy cycle and to provide a framework to guide training and capacity development. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted, analyzing 43 studies that addressed policymaking competencies in public health. Competencies were inductively coded, synthesized, and organized into themes. Results: 64 competencies were identified and mapped into eight domains: analytical and research, political, leadership and management, design thinking, collaboration and networking, communication, resource mobilization, and technology readiness. Analytical and research competencies were most frequently cited, underscoring the centrality of evidence-based decision-making. Design thinking and collaboration also featured prominently, reflecting the growing emphasis on complexity management and stakeholder engagement. By contrast, communication, resource mobilization, and technology readiness were underrepresented, despite their importance for modern policymaking. Conclusions: The resulting eight-domain framework consolidates a fragmented field and underscores the need for more comprehensive competency-building strategies. It offers practical guidance for policymakers, educators, and institutions seeking to strengthen public health leadership.

Summary

Keywords

competencies, framework, Policymaking, public healh, state-of-the-art

Received

31 August 2025

Accepted

14 April 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Frisina Doetter, de Carvalho and de Leon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lorraine Frisina Doetter

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article