Abstract
Objectives:
To examine how public health activities addressing extreme heat align with Canada’s Essential Public Health Functions; the roles taken by public health authorities in collaborative responses; and the extent of heat response evaluations to date in three Canadian provinces.
Methods:
Following Arksey and O’Malley’s Framework, we conducted a scoping review of academic and grey literature on public health heat strategies in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, Canada between 2005 and 2026. We searched ten academic databases, and scanned government and non-government websites. Academic sources were double-screened using Covidence software.
Results:
We identified 26 peer-reviewed articles (British Columbia: 7, Ontario: 8, and Quebec: 16) and 429 grey literature sources. Nine sources evaluated heat responses across the three provinces. Public health authorities across the provinces fulfilled similar Essential Public Health Functions, focused on downstream response including establishing heat alert systems and communicating preventative health information. Public health actors primarily play advisory roles in intersectoral heat responses, though some co-lead responses.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest ongoing gaps in upstream public health heat strategies, and meaningful collaborations with at-risk communities.
Introduction
The frequency and intensity of worldwide extreme heat events are expected to increase as a consequence of climate change throughout the 21st century []. Extreme heat exposure contributes to excess morbidity and mortality through health impacts including heat stroke, dehydration, cardiovascular and respiratory disease, and negative mental health effects []. Models estimate extreme heat causes 489,000 excess deaths per year world-wide [].
In Canada, population centres in southern and coastal regions experience extreme heat, with related mortality rising sharply over the past decade []. Most recently, the 2018 Quebec heatwave caused 80 deaths [], and the 2021 “Heat Dome” in Western Canada resulted in 619 deaths []. High risk populations include older adults, children, individuals with chronic physical or mental health conditions, low-income households, and those experiencing homelessness [].
Given the escalating health risks, public health authorities have an imperative to mitigate the health impacts of climate change. Public health activities addressing heat range Essential Public Health Functions (EPHFs), offered by Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer to describe and categorize the breadth and depth of public health work, and are described in Table 1 [, –]. Public health leaders and researchers have also called for greater collaboration between public health authorities and other sectors (e.g., housing, environment, and community services) to effectively address the factors shaping heat vulnerability [, , ].
TABLE 1
| Essential public health function | Definition | Heat activities |
|---|---|---|
| Health promotion | Improving healthy public policy, community-based interventions, public participation, advocacy or action on determinants of health | Greening infrastructure |
| Health surveillance | Collecting health data for disease tracking and monitoring health inequities | Tracking heat illness and mortality |
| Health protection | Protecting the population from infectious diseases, environmental threats, and unsafe food, water, and air | Education on actions to prevent heat illness |
| Population health assessment | Conducting research to understand the health of communities and populations, determinants of health, and identifying interventions | Heat vulnerability assessments |
| Disease and injury prevention | Promoting healthy behaviours to prevent illness and injury | Community-based heat adaptations |
| Emergency prediction, preparedness, and response | Planning for natural or human-made disasters and responding to emergencies | Heat alert and response systems, health check-ins, cooling spaces, heat response personnel training |
Heat activities aligned with essential public health functions in Canada (2026).
The Essential Public Health Functions are defined by the Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer’s 2022 report on mobilizing public health action for climate change [].
In Canada, public health action on extreme heat spans national and sub-national levels []. At the national level, two government institutions–the Public Health Agency of Canada and Health Canada‐both provide leadership around broad public health aims and functions [], whereas Health Canada also takes a lead role in extreme heat []. Sub-nationally, public health authorities vary in how they engage with environmental health threats like extreme heat [, –]. This variation has yet to be investigated and documented in the academic literature, though a recent government-funded report examined Heat Alert and Response System implementation across Canada [].
This scoping review examines the approach and activities of public health authorities in preventing extreme heat health impacts in the three most populous provinces in Canada–Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia (BC). Specifically, we report how public health heat activities align with EPHFs, and characterize the roles of public health authorities, including leadership, advisory, and coordinating roles, within collaborations. We also report the extent to which public health heat strategies have been evaluated.
Methods
We conducted a scoping review of academic and grey literature to examine the extent and nature of existing provincial, regional, and local extreme heat strategies in BC, Ontario, and Quebec. Our study was guided by the Arksey and O’Malley Scoping Review Framework and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR Checklist [, ]. The search strategy was developed by an academic health sciences librarian (AA) (see Supplementary Data Sheet 1). Nine academic databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid CAB, EBSCO GreenFile, ProQuest PAIS, ProQuest Policy File, Engineering Village GEOREF, Engineering Village GEOBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus. Search strategies were adapted to each database’s command language and appropriate search fields. MeSH terms and textwords captured concepts related to public health, extreme heat, and the three provinces for the original search in Ovid MEDLINE. The search was peer reviewed by a second librarian using PRESS [] before being translated to other databases. Searches were limited by date (January 1, 2005, and June 19, 2026) based on severe heatwaves triggering new responses in 2004, and language (English and French).
Academic citations were uploaded to Covidence, an online software facilitating article sorting and screening. Sources were screened by individual reviewer pairs (MS, IU, SS) following the inclusion criteria in Table 2, starting with title and abstracts, followed by full-text review. Disagreements were resolved through discussion.
TABLE 2
| Criteria | Include |
|---|---|
| Geography | British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec |
| Units of analysis | Local, regional, provincial |
| Focus | Must address public health approach to addressing impacts of extreme or chronic heat exposure |
| Type of intervention | Prevention, mitigation, preparedness, adaptation, response, recovery, resilience |
| Date range | 2005–2026 |
| Languages | French and English |
| Format | Journal articles, editorials, reports, public government documents, legislation, infographics/interactive tools/video, webpages |
Inclusion criteria for academic and grey literature (scoping review, Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec, Canada, 2005–2026).
Grey literature was identified through targeted scans of government, public health agency, and non-governmental organization websites in the three provinces. Scans were supplemented by targeted Google searches using a combination of terms (e.g., [public health authority name] + “extreme heat”) if no results were identified from public health authority websites. Sources were included based on the same inclusion criteria as the academic literature (Table 2). Original searches were completed on November 18, 2023, and a targeted academic and grey literature search update, including Google searches of heat response initiatives undertaken by all three provinces’ public health authorities, was completed on June 24, 2026.
Data extraction and analysis
Data from included sources were extracted according to the research objectives, using data extraction templates (Supplementary Data Sheet 2). The EPHFs described in Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer’s 2022 report on mobilizing public health action for climate change were applied as a framework to report on the range of public health heat activities identified (Table 1) []. Narrative synthesis methods were used to characterize and compare public health roles in addressing extreme heat in each province, and to report on any evaluations of heat response activities.
Results
Review sources
The academic literature search yielded 6370 results (after duplicate removal), of which 26 articles were included for analysis (Supplementary Data Sheet 3: PRISMA diagram). Sixteen articles focused on extreme heat response in Quebec, eight in Ontario, and seven in BC (Table 3, and see Supplementary Data Sheet 4 for details). Of these, three articles focused on two or more provinces [–].
TABLE 3
| Study type | Ontario | British Columbia | Quebec |
|---|---|---|---|
| Descriptive reviews of heat strategies or interventions | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Epidemiological reports | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Methodological development for establishing heat warning thresholds | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Evaluations | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Governance analysis | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Content analysis | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| TOTAL | 8 | 7 | 16 |
Overview of types of academic articles included (scoping review, Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec, Canada, 2005–2026).
Four distinct articles are counted more than once: a descriptive article that appears under both Ontario and Quebec; a governance analysis article and a content analysis article that each appear under Ontario, BC, and Quebec; and a BC article that is counted twice because it uses both evaluation and governance analysis methods.
A total of 429 grey literature sources were retrieved across BC (n = 132), Ontario (n = 167), and Quebec (n = 130). These included informational text and graphic resources via webpages, reports (e.g., vulnerability assessments), protocols and guides, policy documents (e.g., legislation), and interactive tools such as heat maps, educational videos, and infographics. Publicly accessible heat strategies were limited: we identified 6 regional health system heat plans in Quebec, 8 municipal heat plans with public health involvement in Ontario, and 5 municipal heat plans with health authority involvement in BC.
Overview of public health heat activities in each province
The following sections detail how public health authorities in each province have developed and exercise their roles in responding to extreme heat. Provincial governments set standards and fund public health services, while public health units, departments, and agencies administer the programs.
Ontario
Ontario’s public health system consists of 29 local public health units (PHUs) as of 2026, and a provincial public health agency (Public Health Ontario) []. The Ontario Public Health Standards, pursuant to the Health Protection and Promotion Act [], establish minimum requirements for PHU program delivery. Although these requirements are intentionally broad to allow programs to be tailored to local context, they require PHUs to “prevent and reduce the burden of illness from […] extreme weather and extreme temperatures” []. Specific to heat, PHUs are expected, but not mandated, to: 1) receive and communicate Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC, a federal department that monitors and predicts extreme weather) heat warnings; 2) review and share guidance with local partners; and 3) conduct surveillance of heat health impacts and evaluate heat response activities []. The reviewed literature suggests variation in how PHUs meet these expectations.
Regarding the first expectation, and aligned with the emergency prediction, preparedness and response, and health protection EPHFs, the province’s Harmonized Heat Warning and Information System communicates heat warnings to the public. The system, co-developed in 2016 by ECCC, Health Canada, the Ontario Ministry of Health, Public Health Ontario, and partnered PHUs [], is incorporated into the Ontario Public Health Standards, and addresses prior variations in heat alert and response systems across PHUs [, ]. Specifically, it standardizes thresholds for issuing local heat warnings across the province, with ECCC issuing warnings to all affected PHUs based on regional temperature and humidex criteria. Most PHUs display ECCC heat warnings and information on heat-related illnesses and locations of cooling centres and hydration stations on their websites.
Regarding the second expectation, and aligned with the emergency prediction, preparedness and response EPHF, PHUs vary in how they review and share heat response guidance; some lead heat response plans and interventions [–] whereas others appear to play more supporting and advisory roles to municipal authorities [–]. The provincial Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health also advises PHUs on heat emergency planning [].
Regarding the third expectation on surveillance and evaluation, and aligned with the population health assessment EPHF, PHUs can use the Ontario Climate Change and Health Toolkit developed by the provincial Ministry of Health in 2016 to assess health vulnerabilities within their communities []. Several PHUs have led population heat health impact and vulnerability assessments that are publicly available on their websites [–].
British Columbia
BC public health services are delivered through five regional health authorities (RHAs) and one First Nations Health Authority []. The BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) provides public health-related analytical and policy support to RHAs, and conducts population health research and surveillance []. After the 2021 “Heat Dome”, the BC Ministry of Health and BCCDC established the BC Health Effects of Anomalous Temperatures Committee (BC HEAT Committee) to coordinate extreme heat response across levels of governance []. BC’s Public Health Act (2008) and Emergency and Disaster Management Act (2023) authorize provincial ministries, RHAs, and public health officials to lead and respond to heat emergency events []. As part of the Climate Preparedness and Adaptation Strategy, the province developed an extreme heat preparedness guide for use by provincial government agencies, and expanded the Community Emergency Preparedness Fund to include a dedicated stream for local governments and First Nations communities to prepare and respond to extreme heat events [].
Aligned with the emergency prediction, preparedness and response and health protection EPHFs, the BC HEAT Committee established a two-tiered provincial heat alert and response system (HARS) in 2022. Updated annually, the HARS consists of standardized, province-wide temperature thresholds that trigger “heat warnings” and “extreme heat emergencies” that in turn mobilize regional emergency management efforts []. It also includes recommended actions for government sectors, RHAs (including public health divisions), hospitals and community care sites, Indigenous Governing Bodies, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and partner organizations []. Information on heat health protective actions are also published on provincial and RHA webpages [47]. Relatedly, the BCCDC published a guide in 2017 for municipalities seeking to develop heat response plans, including recommendations on collaborations with regional public health divisions [48]. RHAs also provide guidelines for municipal implementation of cooling centres [].
Aligned with the population health assessment and health surveillance EPHFs, the BCCDC and RHAs also conduct research and surveillance on heat-related mortality to generate policy-relevant evidence [49–51]. For example, evidence of socioeconomic disparities in mortality risk during the 2021 “Heat Dome” has since led to greater emphasis on social, economic, and built environment factors in government communications and health authority response planning [50]. Furthermore, two RHAs co-led a climate vulnerability assessment in 2022, including population-level and health system impacts from extreme heat [49].
Quebec
Quebec was the first Canadian province to develop an extreme heat response plan, driven by public health initiative following significant mortality caused by heatwaves in 2001 and 2002 [, 52, 53]. Currently, the Loi sur la Santé Publique gives public health authorities special authority to protect population health from threats such as extreme heat [54–56]. Quebec’s provincial public health programme, Programme National de Santé Publique, further specifies that public health authorities are responsible for sharing preventative heat health information, conducting risk assessments, surveillance and epidemiological reporting, providing protective targeted interventions, implementing alert systems, and providing preparedness, intervention, and recovery services related to extreme heat [57].
Quebec’s public health institute, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ), plays advisory, coordinative, and evaluative roles in addressing the health effects of extreme heat. As subject-matter experts, the INSPQ has produced knowledge syntheses and heat adaptation guides for public health authorities [58, 59]. As part of Quebec’s 2006–2012 Action Plan on Climate Change, the Ministry of Health & Social Services (MSSS) mandated the INSPQ to create a surveillance and warning system for heatwaves [60–62] and evaluate programs aimed at reducing urban heat islands [60, 62, 63].
The INSPQ surveillance and warning system, known as SUPREME, fulfils the health surveillance EPHF. Its functions are to: 1) compile extreme weather data and health impact indicators; 2) transmit real-time extreme weather alerts to personnel; and 3) host a Geoportal website that maps data on a broad range of risks and resources to inform climate planning [64], including mapping urban heat islands [53, 65]. Every year, INSPQ publishes a surveillance report on the health impacts of heatwaves [66, 67].
Other heat-related activities led by provincial public health authorities align with the health promotion and emergency prediction, preparedness and response EPHFs. Specifically, the INSPQ funded 40 urban heat island reduction pilot projects implemented by municipalities and NGOs through the provincial Green Fund financed by the Quebec carbon tax [62, 63]. The INSPQ also conducts epidemiological analyses of the health impacts of heat waves [68], and helps develop evidence-based thresholds for Quebec’s heat warning system [69, 70]. The provincial public health department (Direction Générale de la Santé Publique) monitors heat indicators and co-coordinates the MSSS extreme heat management plan to support regional public health responses [54].
Regional public health activities reflect health surveillance, health protection, population health assessment, and emergency prediction, preparedness and response EPHFs. Quebec’s public health services are regionalized through 22 public health departments integrated within 18 health and social service regions [], and the MSSS heat management plan requires each to have up-to-date heat response plans [54]. Regional public health departments are responsible for activating regional heat alerts, public prevention communications, and coordinating with health system emergency units, municipal governments, and NGOs as part of regional heat response plans [, 54]. They also provide a variety of advisory resources including epidemiological reports on severe heatwaves [63–66, 71–74], local vulnerability assessments [75–81], and heat response guides targeted to municipalities, health services, and other public and private entities [67, 68, 82, 83].
Overall, despite some variations in the legislative frameworks in place, public health authorities primarily perform advisory roles in the three provinces (described in Table 4). Exceptions include the BCCDC and BC Ministry of Health co-leading the BC HEAT Committee, and instances of provincial and regional public health co-leadership in Quebec. In the following sections, we report public health roles in collaborative actions, followed by heat response evaluations across the three provinces.
TABLE 4
| Province | Legislated mandate and powers of public health authorities in heat response | Provincial heat alert system | Provincial public health role in heat response strategy | Regional/Local public health role in heat response strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ontario | The Ontario Public Health Standards (pursuant to Section 7 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act) establishes minimum requirements for PHU services, including to reduce the burden of illness from extreme temperatures [] | Harmonized Heat Warning and Information System (HWIS): Heat warnings issued by ECCC initiate heat response plans led by municipalities and PHUs [] | Advisory role: The Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, Public Health: Advises PHUs regarding heat emergency planning and evaluation activities [] Public Health Ontario: Conducts epidemiological analyses and evidence reviews to inform heat strategy implementation and improvements [, , 84, 85] | Supporting role (with some exceptions): Most PHUs play supporting roles in their municipal/regional heat response strategies (e.g., communicating heat warnings) []. Some PHUs lead or co-lead heat response strategies [–] |
| British Columbia | The Public Health Act and the Emergency and Disaster Management Act authorize public health officials and RHAs to lead and respond to heat emergency events, but does not mandate specific responses [] | Heat Alert and Response System (HARS): Threshold-specific heat warnings, issued by ECCC, and extreme heat emergencies, issued through coordination between the BC HEAT operations sub-committee and ECCC. Both tiers are accompanied by distinct recommended actions for various government sectors and partner organizations [] | Lead role: BCCDC Works with RHAs, ECCC and health Canada to establish heat alert thresholds, leads the BC HEAT committee alongside the Ministry of Health, and conducts surveillance of heat-related health impacts [, 50] | Supporting role: Most public health departments within RHAs have advisory roles in local heat response strategies (e.g., implementing heat response communications) [, 86] |
| Quebec | The Loi sur la Santé Publique gives public health authorities special powers to protect population health under threat [56]. Quebec’s Programme National de Santé Publique, (established within the Loi sur la Santé Publique legal framework), specifies public health responsibilities for addressing environmental threats including extreme heat [57] | Système de Surveillance et de Prévention des impacts sanitaires des Evènements Météorologiques Extrêmes (SUPREME): Issues heat alerts to regional public health departments who decide whether to activate the alert level of their plans (imminent threat). If they activate, the MSSS also activate to the alert level of the provincial plan [54] If multiple regions activate the alert level at the same time, the MSSS activates their full plan to coordinate across regions [54] If extreme heat threshold is met, the regional public health department decides to escalate to the mobilization (emergency) level response. Thresholds differ by region [54] | Lead role: Institut National de la Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ): Hosts and manages the SUPREME weather surveillance and heat alert system [53] Direction Générale de la Santé Publique: Co-coordinates the provincial heat response strategy for actors within the health and social services sector. Mobilizes provincial heat response strategy when two or more regions activate heat alerts to align regional responses [54] | Central role in health and social sectors response: Regional public health departments are responsible for activating regional heat alerts, public prevention communications, and coordinating with health system emergency units, municipal governments, and NGOs as part of regional heat response plans [54] |
Public health heat response across Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec, Canada (2005–2026).
Public health roles in collaborations addressing extreme heat
Our review identified collaborative efforts to address extreme heat across organizations (horizontal collaboration), across levels of government (vertical collaboration), and across sectors (intersectoral collaboration). BC was the only province with a clear framework facilitating horizontal intersectoral collaboration at the provincial level through the BC HEAT committee, co-led by the BCCDC and BC Ministry of Health. Across all provinces, collaboration at local and regional levels was more common than at the provincial level, often spanning public health authorities, local governments, and other sectors and partner organizations (e.g., community organizations). Municipalities often lead these collaborations as part of their heat response plans, with public health authorities playing an advisory role [, , 86, 87]. Examples of public health’s collaborative leadership include the Waterloo Region Extreme Heat and Cold Partnership [] and North Bay Parry Sound District Heath Unit’s Extreme Heat Advisory Plan [] in Ontario. Additionally, the Northern Ontario Climate Change and Health collaborative is a unique public health-specific network of seven PHUs seeking to collaboratively enhance their capacities to mitigate climate change health impacts [88].
In Quebec, many local public health departments co-lead heat response collaboration between regional and municipal civil security divisions [74, 83, 89]. For example, the Montreal regional public health department collaborates closely with the health system emergency unit (Coordination régionale des mesures d’urgence, de la sécurité civile et accès réseau) and the City of Montreal’s Civil Security Centre to plan population-level interventions and ensure alignment between the health system and the city heat response plans [, 55]. Some public health authorities were observed to coordinate NGO partnerships to establish green spaces [90, 87], and to support seniors and individuals with mental health conditions measure indoor air temperatures [91].
Our review also identified examples of ‘vertical’ public health collaboration. Health Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada, and the INSPQ regularly support the climate adaptation efforts of local public health authorities through expertise and ad hoc funding [92]. Notably, Health Canada finances multiple provincial and regional public health authorities conducting climate change health vulnerability assessments and heat response planning through the HealthADAPT program [49, 80, 92–94], and the recent HeatADAPT program [95].
Extent of existing evaluations of heat responses
Our review did not uncover any comprehensive evaluations of provincial or sub-provincial heat response strategies. Existing evaluations focus on specific response components or outcomes. Six evaluations were identified in Quebec, two in Ontario, and one in BC. Those in Quebec pertain to Montreal’s local heat response plan and provincial systems related to extreme weather. A 2007 evaluation of a public heat health education campaign by Montreal’s Public Health Department revealed a positive association between preventative messaging and adoption of preventative measures during heat events. The evaluation also highlighted that limited informational, financial, and social resources impeded the ability of high-risk seniors to adopt these measures [96]. A 2018 study analyzing the implementation of the Montreal heat response plan similarly found that while preventative measures were known and applied by healthcare personnel, their awareness and application was variable among vulnerable populations [97]. The study also highlighted the need to rapidly mobilize sufficient personnel as a central challenge of responding to heatwaves [97]. A related study from 2018 examined the validity of the term “vulnerable populations” in the Montreal heat response plan, finding that while individuals with schizophrenia do tend to view themselves as more vulnerable to heat, people with drug or alcohol addictions may not. The study also revealed that certain heat response interventions, such as targeted phone check-ins, were not always well received and could benefit from co-design with affected communities [98]. A 2016 quantitative evaluation found that the Montreal heat response plan helped to reduce mortality on hot days, with larger effects among elderly and low-socioeconomic status populations [99].
In 2017, an evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of SUPREME in predicting heatwaves concluded that, while the system performed well, its sensitivity could be improved through minor adjustments to its alert criteria [100]. Finally, a 2016 evaluation of a selection of the urban heat island reduction projects funded by INSPQ found that some achieved significant cooling effects [63].
In Ontario, a population-based time series analysis of the impacts of the provincial Harmonized Heat Warning and Information System between 2012-2018 revealed a reduction in emergency department visits among certain populations, including those under 18 years of age, with co-morbidities, or living in rural communities, though the changes were not statistically significant [101]. Furthermore, a 2012 qualitative study on climate change adaptation efforts identified the need for provincial public health standards that explicitly address extreme heat mitigation and adaptation goals, and increased federal and provincial funding to support local adaptation strategies []. Study participants stated the importance of intersectoral collaboration to implement adaptation activities, such as multi-agency workshops to conduct extreme heat vulnerability assessments.
A 2025 BC study evaluated cooling centres across municipalities in Greater Vancouver through semi-structured interviews with public sector professionals []. Identified challenges included limited funding, staffing shortages, and infrastructure constraints. Opportunities to strengthen planning and operations include better collaboration across sectors and NGOs, improved outreach to communities, and harmonization of extreme weather responses.
Discussion
This scoping review is, to our knowledge, the first comparing public health actions in heat responses across multiple Canadian provinces, and complements a recent government-funded report on HARS implementation in Canada []. Specifically, we aimed to report how public health heat activities across Ontario, BC, and Quebec are aligned with EPHFs, characterize the roles taken by public health authorities, and report the extent to which public health heat strategies have been evaluated. We uncovered limited attention within the academic literature to public health action in Ontario and BC; most studies were from Quebec, perhaps owing to the dedicated funding for public health research on extreme heat through the provincial Green Fund, as well as Quebec’s long-standing public health focus on addressing extreme heat [, 61, 102]. The grey literature provided a wide range of sources demonstrating public health actions addressing extreme heat across the three provinces, however publicly accessible heat strategies were limited.
We found that public health authorities across all three provinces are largely engaged in activities related to emergency prediction, preparedness and response, health protection, and population health assessment. Core public health activities consisted of establishing province-wide heat alert systems, conducting heat vulnerability assessments, and publicly communicating preventative heat health information. One study that examined 99 public health authority websites across Canada found that Ontario accounted for 37% of all communication related to heat health information, with BC at 23% and Quebec at 10% [103]. Epidemiologic research activities on heat-related health impacts were also conducted by public health authorities in BC and Quebec, relating to the health surveillance EPHF. Notably, we identified articles or reports of activities relating to the health promotion EPHF only in Quebec, specifically through the urban heat island reduction pilot projects, and identified no clear instances of disease and injury prevention.
The three provinces’ public health heat activities are similar to other jurisdictions including the United States and Europe [–]. Yet, the extent to which public health authorities engage in upstream prevention of health risks was unclear, such as developing and advocating for indoor temperature bylaws, air conditioning access programs, tenant protections, and urban heat island mitigation [, 61, 63], to complement the apparent focus on downstream preparedness and response [, ]. Public health activities that span the upstream-downstream continuum are necessary to effectively address climate-related health impacts []. Relatedly, we found limited evidence of public health engagement with communities, particularly those most at risk of health impacts from heat. Supporting community-based adaptation and mitigation strategies enables context-specific approaches that leverage local knowledge and leadership [, ].
Our search identified that all three provinces have legislation in place that mandates public health authorities to protect populations from health threats and authorizes special powers for response. However, as these legislative frameworks do not stipulate actions on extreme heat, public health responsibilities vary. Our review also identified similarities and differences across the three provinces in terms of how public health authorities’ roles in heat response are characterized. At the provincial level, the BCCDC and BC Ministry of Health co-lead the intersectoral BC HEAT Committee, while Quebec’s provincial public health authorities, the Direction Générale de la Santé Publique and INSPQ, help coordinate health and social service sector response, with particular support for public health interventions. In Ontario, we identified an advisory role for the Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health and Public Health Ontario. We found that sub-provincial public health authorities play an advisory role in heat response strategies in BC, whereas in Quebec and Ontario, some regional heat response plans suggest co-leadership responsibilities for their public health departments [].
Intersectoral collaboration on extreme heat response was prominent across the three provinces, and some studies have examined the role of public health authorities in the intersectoral governance of heat strategies. Two studies found that formal governance arrangements supporting extreme heat response are concentrated between the provincial and regional levels rather than with the federal government [, 92]. Furthermore, legislative mandates, formal response plans outlining roles and responsibilities, and coordinating structures for network engagement supported effective intersectoral collaboration on extreme heat response in Canadian cities and reduced duplication of efforts [, , 92]. Intersectoral governance analyses may help inform more equitable strategies for mobilizing resources and expertise from diverse sectors.
Core challenges and facilitators in addressing extreme heat
Actors face multiple challenges in responding to extreme heat, including emergency workforce availability, identifying priority populations, sustained funding, political support, and effective communications [, 96, 97, 104]. Recent studies have also highlighted ongoing gaps in governance to align work on climate emergencies [, 104, 105]. Nevertheless, provincial guides and toolkits, vulnerability mapping, and cross-jurisdictional learning seem to support development and improvement of heat responses [, 58, 65]. Targeted funds such as Quebec’s Green Fund also enabled the implementation of effective preventative measures such as urban greening projects and research supporting the advancement of heat strategies [59, 102]. BC’s extreme heat-targeted funding through the Community Emergency Preparedness Fund was initiated to support local governments and First Nations communities in extreme heat risk mapping and response efforts [106]. However, we could not uncover specific examples of how communities used this funding.
Published heat strategy evaluations remain limited in Canada. Our review found no comprehensive evaluation of provincial or sub-provincial heat strategies, and a related report found few HARS include an evaluation plan in Canada []. Existing evaluations focused on a single intervention or outcome of interest. This reflects a broader global trend of under-evaluation of heat responses []. Nonetheless, quantitative strategy evaluations identified in this review reported reductions in heat mortality and emergency department visits, for vulnerable populations in particular, and qualitative studies made recommendations for improvement of heat strategy components. Strategy evaluations are important for assessing both the effectiveness and quality of interventions in producing health outcomes, though collecting outcomes data and establishing causal links to heat strategy interventions remains challenging [, ]. However, strategies may be evaluated without relying on core measures and causal links, such as collecting data on alternative explanatory factors, and leveraging incremental plan changes to evaluate the impacts of new interventions [107]. Researchers could support more comprehensive evaluations, and partnerships across agencies can facilitate data sharing [107].
Furthermore, vulnerability to extreme heat is higher in certain populations depending on various biological, psychological, and socioeconomic factors []. Our review found that public health authorities across the three provinces conduct vulnerability assessments to identify populations at high risk to extreme heat, and convey information targeted to these populations. For example, public health authorities developed webpages and infographics specific to children, seniors, and workers [103, 108–112], and conducted targeted phone check-ins with at-risk individuals [98]. In this way, public health response to extreme heat aims to reduce inequitable heat health impacts. Nevertheless, one study demonstrated that groups identified as “vulnerable to heat” by public health authorities do not necessarily perceive themselves as such, and that targeted interventions are not always well-received [98]. This highlights the need for improved engagement of diverse populations in local heat response planning to prevent stigmatization and develop appropriate interventions []. Other studies have recommended greater efforts towards policy change to improve material and social conditions, reflecting broader calls to prevent heat and climate vulnerability by addressing socioeconomic and political structures as the primary drivers of vulnerability and inequitable heat impacts [, 113]. International perspectives also support moving towards a collective approach to heat resilience and public health equity through community-based approaches and stronger intersectoral collaboration [, , 113]. Moving toward such system-level approaches in close collaboration with high-risk communities could help mitigate the inequitable health effects caused by heatwaves by reorienting strategies toward addressing the root causes of vulnerability.
Limitations
There are some limitations to this study. While nearly all public health authorities scanned provide extreme heat health information resources, many do not publish heat response plans, making it difficult to gauge the full extent of work being done. As a result, we reported public health responsibilities as outlined by provincial agencies, but were not always able to verify whether these are put into practice. Publishing public health strategies and plans would facilitate knowledge sharing across regions, as well as further research supporting continued strategy improvement [107]. We minimized the risk of reporting bias, a prevalent limitation of scoping reviews [114], by establishing data extraction templates that were used in all three cases (Supplementary Data Sheet 2).
Conclusion
This scoping review highlights how public health authorities across three Canadian provinces tend to play an advisory role within heat responses, though some are involved in coordination of efforts across sectors. While public health authorities appear primarily focused on downstream responsive heat-related activities, some public health leaders propose how the public health sector may also be critical to advancing upstream prevention and resilience. Our findings suggest there is room for public health authorities to further clarify and develop their role in addressing extreme heat impacts, including building meaningful collaborations with communities and across sectors.
Statements
Author contributions
SA, MS, SS, EX, and QZ designed the study approach. SA, SS, MS, and AA (Research Librarian) developed the methodology. AA, SS, IU, and MS conducted the scoping review searches. MS, SS, and IU conducted article screening, data extraction, and analysis. SA oversaw the analysis and provided guidance. MS and IU drafted the initial manuscript. SA, SS, EX, and QZ took part in interpretation of findings and drawing conclusions. All authors contributed to the article revisions and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This project is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Catalyst Grant: “Chief Public Health Officer (CPHO) Report 2022: Mobilizing Public Health Action on Climate Change in Canada” (FO4-189640), for the project titled “Public health systems governance for intersectoral action on climate change”. Preliminary work for this study was supported by the the Dalla Lana School of Public Health Implementation Science Trainee Cluster.
Acknowledgments
This work builds on an initial environmental scan conducted by Melanie Seabrook, Sara Allin, Edward Xie, Jane Zhao, Aranie Vijayaratnam, Karen Young, and Celia Laur as part of the Dalla Lana School of Public Health Implementation Science Trainee Cluster in 2022. We would like to thank Anjali Joshi-Dave for assisting with an initial literature search, and Monika Roerig for assistance with grant conceptualization and management, and for editing this manuscript. We would also like to thank our project working group and co-investigators.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/phrs.2026.1609625/full#supplementary-material
Abbreviations
BC, British Columbia; BC HEAT Committee, BC Health Effects of Anomalous Temperatures Committee; BCCDC, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control; ECCC, Environment and Climate Change Canada; EPHF, Essential Public Health Function; HARS, Heat Alert and Response System; INSPQ, Institut National de la Santé Publique du Québec; MSSS, Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux; NGO, Non-Governmental Organization; PHU, Public Health Unit; RHA, Regional Health Authority; SUPREME, Système de surveillance et de prévention des impacts sanitaires des événements météorologiques extrêmes.
References
1.
World Health Organization. Heat and health (2024). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-heat-and-health (Accessed August 5, 2025).
2.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Chief Public Health Officer of Canada’s Report on the State of Public Health in Canada 2022: Mobilizing Public Health Action on Climate Change in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada (2022). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/corporate/publications/chief-public-health-officer-reports-state-public-health-canada/state-public-health-canada-2022/report-rapport/report.pdf (Accessed February 28, 2026).
3.
ZhaoQGuoYYeTGasparriniATongSOvercencoAet alGlobal, regional, and national burden of mortality associated with non-optimal ambient temperatures from 2000 to 2019: a three-stage modelling study. The Lancet Planet Health (2021) 5:e415–e425. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00081-4
4.
Health Canada. Heat-related morbidity and mortality in Canada (2025). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/heat-related-morbidity-mortality.html (Accessed August 5, 2025).
5.
LebelGLamotheFDubéMBustinzaR. In: Surveillance Des Impacts Des Vagues De Chaleur Extrême Sur La Santé Au Québec À L’Été 2018. Québec, QC: Institut national de santé publique du Québec (2022). Available online at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/publications/surveillance-impacts-vagues-chaleur-extreme-sur-sante-quebec-l-ete-2018 (Accessed August 5, 2025).
6.
BeuginDClarkDMillerSNessRPelaiRWaleJ. The Case for Adapting to Extreme Heat: Costs of the 2021 B.C Heat Wave. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Climate Institute (2023). Available online at: https://climateinstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/The-case-for-adapting-to-extreme-heat-costs-of-the-BC-heat-wave.pdf (Accessed January 27, 2026).
7.
BerryPSchnitterR. Health of Canadians in a Changing Climate: Advancing Our Knowledge for Action. Ottawa: Government of Canada (2022). Available online at: https://changingclimate.ca/health-in-a-changing-climate/ (Accessed September 23, 2024).
8.
BellMLGasparriniABenjaminGC. Climate change, extreme heat, and health. New Engl J Med (2024) 390:1793–801. 10.1056/NEJMra2210769
9.
HasanFMarsiaSPatelKAgrawalPRazzakJA. Effective community-based interventions for the prevention and management of heat-related illnesses: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2021) 18:8362. 10.3390/ijerph18168362
10.
HessJJErrettNAMcGregorGIsaksenTBWettsteinZSWheatSKet alPublic health preparedness for extreme heat events. Annu Rev Public Health (2023) 44:301–21. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071421-025508
11.
WHO. Heat-Health Action Plans: Guidance. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Europe (2008). Available online at: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/79111f86-8583-4b25-be8e-7b183bfa14ba/content (Accessed December 15, 2025).
12.
Global Heat Health Information Network. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, World Meteorological Organization. an Assessment of Heat Action Plans: Global Standards, Good Practices and Partnerships. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization (2025). Available online at: https://www.undrr.org/media/108606/download?startDownload=20251215 (Accessed December 15, 2025).
13.
NunesAR. Public health approaches to ‘Leave No One Behind’ in heatwave resilience: insights from the UK. Eur J Public Health (2025) 35:171–7. 10.1093/eurpub/ckae187
14.
Public Health Agency of Canada. The Chief Public Health Officer of Canada’s Report on the State of Public Health in Canada 2021. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada (2021). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/phac-aspc/documents/corporate/publications/chief-public-health-officer-reports-state-public-health-canada/state-public-health-canada-2021/cpho-report-eng.pdf (Accessed August 6, 2025).
15.
Health Canada. Health portfolio (2024). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/corporate/health-portfolio.html (Accessed August 7, 2025).
16.
Health Canada. Heat Alert and Response Systems to Protect Health: Best Practices Guidebook. Ottawa: Health Canada (2012). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/ewh-semt/alt_formats/pdf/pubs/climat/response-intervention/response-intervention-eng.pdf (Accessed February 28, 2026).
17.
ArpinESmithRWCheungAThomasMLuuKLiJet alProfiles of Public Health Systems in Canada: Québec. Montreal: Gouvernement du Québec (2022). p. 41. Available online at: https://ccnpps-ncchpp.ca/docs/2022-Profiles-of-Public-Health-Systems-in-Canada-Quebec.pdf (Accessed February 19, 2023).
18.
AustinSEFordJDBerrang-FordLAraosMParkerSFleuryMD. Public health adaptation to climate change in Canadian jurisdictions. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2015) 12:623–51. 10.3390/ijerph120100623
19.
SmithRWAllinSRosellaLLuuKThomasMLiJet alProfiles of Public Health Systems in Canada: Ontario. Montreal: Gouvernement du Québec (2021). p. 42. Available online at: https://ccnpps-ncchpp.ca/docs/2021-Profiles-of-Public-Health-Systems-in-Canada-Ontario.pdf (Accessed February 19, 2025).
20.
SmithRWAllinSThomasMLiJLuuKRosellaLet alProfiles of Public Health Systems in Canada: British Columbia. Montreal: Gouvernement du Québec (2022). p. 49. Available online at: https://ccnpps-ncchpp.ca/docs/2022-Profiles-of-Public-Health-Systems-in-Canada-British-Columbia.pdf (Accessed February 19, 2025).
21.
GouldingRLoftusE. Heat Alert and Response Systems in Canada: A check-up on Preparedness. Vancouver, BC: National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (2025). Available online at: https://ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/2025-04/NCCEH%20Pan%20Canadian%20HARS%20Stocktake%20Public%20Report%20-%20FINAL%20EN%20-%2016APR2025.pdf (Accessed May 21, 2026).
22.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int Journal Social Research Methodology (2005) 8:19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616
23.
TriccoACLillieEZarinWO’BrienKKColquhounHLevacDet alPRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med (2018) 169:467–73. 10.7326/M18-0850
24.
McGowanJSampsonMSalzwedelDMCogoEFoersterVLefebvreC. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol (2016) 75:40–6. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
25.
KosatskyTKingNHenryB. How Toronto and Montreal (Canada) respond to heat. In: KirchWBertolliniRMenneB, editors. Extreme Weather Events and Public Health Responses. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (2005). p. 167–71. 10.1007/3-540-28862-7_16
26.
SimpsonSSeabrookMSSDi RuggieroEGautierLMillerFARoerigMet alA comparative case study of collaborative governance for intersectoral extreme heat response in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal, Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2026) 23:506. 10.3390/ijerph23040506
27.
ApantakuGOPolgárAGirouxFGiangAGladwinDEllisN. Heat, smoke, and urban health: cooling and cleaner air centres as a tool for adaptation in a Canadian urban region. Cities & Health (2025) 9:828–43. 10.1080/23748834.2025.2558285
28.
Ontario Ministry of Health. Ontario Public Health Standards: Requirements for Programs, Services and Accountability. Toronto: Queen’s Printer of Ontario (2021). Available online at: https://files.ontario.ca/moh-ontario-public-health-standards-en-2021.pdf (Accessed December 05, 2025).
29.
Ontario Ministry of Health. Harmonized Heat Warning and Information System for Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health (2023). Available online at: https://files.ontario.ca/moh-harmonized-heat-warning-and-information-system-for-ontario-hwis-en-2023-05-29.pdf (Accessed December 05, 2025).
30.
Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). Environmental Scan: Heat Alert and Response Systems (HARS). Toronto, ON: Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion Public Health Ontario (2023). Available online at: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/H/2023/heat-alert-response-systems-hars.pdf?rev=ace664c3f1b04aa4b23ccee4f6aa3b81&sc_lang=en (Accessed January 27, 2025).
31.
HendersonDAubinLBehanKChenHDoyleHGowerSet alDeveloping a harmonized heat warning and information system for Ontario: a case study in collaboration. Can J Public Health (2020) 111:426–32. 10.17269/s41997-020-00337-y
32.
City of Greater Sudbury, Public Health Sudbury & Districts. City of greater sudbury hot weather response plan (2023). Available online at: https://www.greatersudbury.ca/live/emergency-services/emergency-management/hot-weather-response-plan/ (Accessed November 20, 2025).
33.
BuseCGBrubacherJLappHJacksonEWilsonRBevisBet alClimate change and health vulnerability assessment for Waterloo Region, Wellington County, Dufferin County, and the City of Guelph. In: Waterloo and Guelph, ON: Region of Waterloo Public Health and wellington-dufferin-guelph Public Health Unit (2022). Available online at: https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/health-and-wellness/resources/Documents/Climate-Change-and-Health-Vulnerability-Assessment.pdf (Accessed January 27, 2026).
34.
North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit. Municipalities. Available online at: https://www.myhealthunit.ca/en/health-professionals-and-partners/municipalities.aspx (Accessed December 2, 2025).
35.
Durham Region. Towards resilience: Durham community climate adaptation plan 2016 (2016). Available online at: https://www.durham.ca/en/living-here/resources/Documents/EnvironmentalStability/DCCAP_Print.pdf (Accessed September 26, 2025).
36.
City of Hamilton. Communication Update. Hamilton (2022). Available online at: https://www.hamilton.ca/sites/default/files/2022-07/CU-hsc-extreme-heat-weather-protocol.pdf (Accessed January 27, 2026).
37.
City of Toronto. Heat Relief Strategy. City of Toronto (2022). Available online at: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/8f66-Heat-Relief-Strategy-2022.pdf (Accessed February 9, 2026).
38.
Public Health Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph. Protecting our community from extreme heat – public Health’s role. WDG Public Health. Available online at: https://wdgpublichealth.ca/blog/protecting-our-community-extreme-heat-%E2%80%93-public-health%E2%80%99s-role (Accessed December 5, 2025).
39.
SandersonMDoyleHWalshP. Developing and implementing a targeted health-focused climate communications campaign in Ontario—#MakeItBetter. Can J Public Health (2020) 111:869–75. 10.17269/s41997-020-00352-z
40.
BerryPPatersonJBuseC. Assessment of Vulnerability to the Health Impacts of Climate Change in Middlesex-London County. Ottawa, ON: Middlesex-London Health Unit (2014). Available online at: https://docslib.org/doc/3159804/assessment-of-vulnerability-to-the-health-impacts-of-climate-change-in-middlesex-london (Accessed January 27, 2026).
41.
LevisonMMButlerAJRebellatoSArmstrongBWhelanMGardnerC. Development of a climate change vulnerability assessment using a public health lens to determine local health vulnerabilities: an Ontario health unit experience. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2018) 15:2237. 10.3390/ijerph15102237
42.
York Region Public Health. York Region Climate Change and Health Vulnerability Assessment. York Region Public Health (2020). Available online at: https://www.york.ca/media/93506/download (Accessed October 08, 2025).
43.
PatersonJAFordJDFordLBLesnikowskiABerryPHendersonJet alAdaptation to climate change in the Ontario public health sector. BMC Public Health (2012) 12:452. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-452
44.
BC Ministry of Health, BC Ministry of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness. Extreme Heat: Preparedness for Provincial Ministries and Agencies (2022). Available online at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/public-safety-and-emergency-services/emergency-preparedness-response-recovery/provincial-emergency-planning/extreme_heat_preparedness_for_ministries_and_agencies.pdf (Accessed October 12, 2025).
45.
Government of British Columbia. Climate Preparedness and Adaptation Strategy: Actions for 2022-2025. British Columbia: Government of British Columbia (2022). Available online at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/climate-change/adaptation/cpas.pdf (Accessed January 27, 2026).
46.
BC HEAT Committee. BC Provincial Heat Alert and Response System. Victoria: Government of British Columbia (2023).
47.
TetzlaffEJGouletNGormanMRichardsonGRAEnrightPMMeadeRDet alHot topic: a systematic review and content analysis of heat-related messages during the 2021 heat dome in Canada. J Public Health Management Pract (2024) 30:295–305. 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001817
48.
LubikAKosatskyT. Developing a Municipal Heat Response Plan: A Guide for Mediumsized Municipalities. Vancouver: Government of British Columbia (2017). Available online at: https://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/Health-Environment/Developing%20a%20municipal%20heat%20response%20plan.pdf (Accessed October 13, 2025).
49.
Vancouver Coastal Health and Fraser Health. Climate Change Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (2022). Available online at: https://www.vch.ca/sites/default/files/import/documents/HealthADAPT-Vulnerability-Capacity.pdf (Accessed December 5, 2025).
50.
HendersonSBMcLeanKELeeMJKosatskyT. Analysis of community deaths during the catastrophic 2021 heat dome: early evidence to inform the public health response during subsequent events in greater Vancouver, Canada. Environ Epidemiol (2022) 6:e189. 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000189
51.
McLeanKELeeMJCokerESHendersonSB. A population-based case-control analysis of risk factors associated with mortality during the 2021 western North American heat dome: focus on chronic conditions and social vulnerability. Environ Res Health (2024) 2:035010. 10.1088/2752-5309/ad5eac
52.
PriceKPerronSKingN. Implementation of the Montreal heat response plan during the 2010 heat wave. Can J Public Health (2013) 104:e96–e100. 10.1007/BF03405667
53.
ToutantSGosselinPBélangerDBustinzaRRivestS. An open source web application for the surveillance and prevention of the impacts on public health of extreme meteorological events: the SUPREME system. Int J Health Geographics (2011) 10:39. 10.1186/1476-072X-10-39
54.
Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux. Plan Ministériel De Gestion Des Épisodes De Chaleur Extrême. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec (2021). Available online at: https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/2021/21-269-04W.pdf (Accessed May 14, 2025).
55.
CIUSSS Du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal. Plan Régional De Prévention Et De Protection: Chaleur Accablante Et Extrême - 2024. Montréal: Gouvernement du Québec (2024). Available online at: https://www.extranetccsmtl.ca/fileadmin/CIUSSS/DirectionsAdministratives/ServicesTechniques/OutilsInformations/CoordinationLocaleMesuresUrgenceSecuriteCivile/mesures_urgence/PlanCAE2024_VF.pdf (Accessed February 9, 2026).
56.
Gouvernement du Québec. Loi sur la santé publique. Available online at: https://www.legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/document/lc/S-2.2 (Accessed February 14, 2024).
57.
Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux. Programme National De Santé Publique – 2015-2025. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec (2015). Available online at: https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/2015/15-216-01W.pdf (Accessed September 30, 2024).
58.
LaplanteLRomanS. Guide D’Intervention: Chaleur Accablante Volet Santé Publique. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec (2006). Available online at: https://www.yumpu.com/fr/document/read/17423754/guide-dintervention-chaleur-accablante-ministere-de-la-sante-et- (Accessed March 20, 2024).
59.
BustinzaRDemers-BouffardD. Mesures D’Adaptation à la Chaleur: Rapport De Synthèse. Québec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec (2021). Available online at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/2792-mesures-adaptation-chaleur.pdf (Accessed June 22, 2026).
60.
Gosselin P, Bélanger D, Lapaige V, Labbé YBélangerDLapaigeVLabbéY. The burgeoning field of transdisciplinary adaptation research in Quebec (1998–): a climate change-related public health narrative. JMDH (2011) 4:337–48. 10.2147/JMDH.S14294
61.
GosselinPBélangerD. Research, impacts, and adaptation in public health for the new climate in Quebec. Sante Publique (2010) 22:291–302. 10.3917/spub.103.0291
62.
Ministère du Développement Durable, Environnement et Parcs. Climate Change Action Plan 2006–2012. Quebec: Ministère du Développement Durable, Environnement et Parcs (2006). Available online at: https://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/changements/plan_action/2006-2012_en.pdf (Accessed November 18, 2025).
63.
BeaudoinMGosselinP. An effective public health program to reduce urban heat islands in Québec, Canada. Rev Panam Salud Publica (2016) 40:160–6.
64.
CanuelMGosselinPDuhouxABrunetALesageA. Boîte À Outils Pour La Surveillance Post-sinistre Des Impacts Sur La Santé Mentale. Montréal: Institut national de santé publique du Québec INSPQ (2019). Available online at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/2523_boite_outils_surveillance_post_sinistre.pdf (Accessed November 11, 2025).
65.
INSPQ. Géoportail De Santé Publique Du Québec. INSPQ. Available online at: https://cartes.inspq.qc.ca/geoportail/?context=climatadaptationchangementsclimatiques&zoom=10¢er=-71.89978,45.47032&invisiblelayers=*&visiblelayers=4e5941b4738013d3d04ea7d5f1ff2f5b,carte_gouv_qc (Accessed October 16, 2025).
66.
Institut national de santé publique du Québec. Surveillance des impacts de la chaleur. Gouvernement du Québec (2026). Available online at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/changements-climatiques/menaces/chaleur/surveillance (Accessed June 22, 2026).
67.
LamotheFDubéMBoudreaultJBustinzaR. Surveillance Des Impacts Sanitaires De La Chaleur Extrême Et Estivale Au Québec – Bilan 2025. Québec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec (2026). Available online at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/3833-impacts-sanitaires-chaleur-quebec-2025.pdf (Accessed June 22, 2026).
68.
BustinzaRLebelGGosselinPBélangerDChebanaF. Health impacts of the July 2010 heat wave in Québec, Canada. BMC Public Health (2013) 13:56. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-56
69.
ChebanaFMartelBGosselinPGirouxJ-XOuardaTBMJ. A general and flexible methodology to define thresholds for heat health watch and warning systems, applied to the province of Quebec (Canada). Int Journal Biometeorology (2013) 57:631–44. 10.1007/s00484-012-0590-2
70.
IssaMAChebanaFMasselotPCampagnaCLavigneÉGosselinPet alA heat-health watch and warning system with extended season and evolving thresholds. BMC Public Health (2021) 21:1479. 10.1186/s12889-021-10982-8
71.
CIUSSS de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec. Chaleur extrême de juillet 2018 en Mauricie et au Centre-du-Québec. CIUSSS de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (2020). Available online at: https://ciusssmcq.ca/telechargement/1141/enquete-chaleur-extreme-de-juillet-2018 (Accessed November 24, 2025).
72.
LamotheFRoyMRacine-HamelS-É. Enquête épidémiologique - vague de chaleur à l’été 2018 à Montréal. Dir régionale de santé publique du CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (2019). Available online at: https://santemontreal.qc.ca/fileadmin/user_upload/Uploads/tx_asssmpublications/pdf/publications/Enquete_epidemiologique_-_Vague_de_chaleur_a_l_ete_2018_a_Montreal_version15mai_EUSHV_finale.pdf (Accessed March 21, 2024).
73.
RamosYTrépanierJ-PSt-DenisASusserSTranCD. Vague de Chaleur de l’été 2018: Rapport d’enquête Épidémiologique. Laval (Québec): Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Laval (2019). Available online at: https://www.lavalensante.com/fileadmin/internet/cisss_laval/Documentation/Sante_publique/Rapports_et_memoires/2019/Rapport_vague_de_chaleur_2018_Laval_final_2019-05-29__2_.pdf (Accessed November 24, 2025).
74.
CIUSSS de l’Estrie. Chaleur Extrême: juin-juillet 2018 – Bilan Estrien. CIUSSS de l’Estrie (2019). Available online at: https://www.santeestrie.qc.ca/clients/SanteEstrie/Publications/Sante-publique/Bulletin-vision/2019/49_Vision_sante_publique_Chaleur-Extreme.pdf (Accessed November 24, 2025).
75.
VescoviLBourqueASimonetGMusyA. Transfer of climate knowledge via a regional climate-change management body to support vulnerability, impact assessments and adaptation measures. Clim Res (2009) 40:163–73. 10.3354/cr00787
76.
BarrisAGoudreauSLocasM-CBeaudoinFLévesqueMRobergeC. Évaluation de la vulnérabilité de l’agglomération de Montréal aux changements climatiques. In: Centre Intégré Universitaire De Santé Et De Services Sociaux Du Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal. Montréal (Québec) (2024). Available online at: https://santepubliquemontreal.ca/sites/drsp/files/media/document/DRSP_Pub_2024_VRAC.pdf (Accessed October 16, 2025).
77.
FéretAGénéreuxMLapointeDMorinÉSatilmisL. Changements Climatiques: Agissons Pour Des Communautés En Santé. Sherbrooke, Québec: Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (2023). Available online at: https://www.santeestrie.qc.ca/clients/SanteEstrie/Publications/Sante-publique/2023/RA-CIUSSS-santepublique_vf_web.pdf (Accessed October 16, 2025).
78.
GuerraN. Évaluation de la vulnérabilité populationnelle régionale aux changements climatiques (VRAC). In: Saint-Jérôme (Québec): Direction De Santé Publique Des Laurentides. Saint-Jérôme: Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des Laurentides (2023). p. 245. Available online at: https://www.santelaurentides.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/internet/cisss_laurentides/Sante_Publique/Rapport_du_DSP/RAP_2023-11-29_VRAC_Laurentides.pdf (Accessed October 16, 2025).
79.
Turgeon-PelchatCDodelerCSavardATurcotteSAubé-MauriceJ. Santé et adaptation aux changements climatiques au Bas-Saint-Laurent. Volet Évaluation de la vulnérabilité populationnelle régionale aux changements climatiques (VRAC). In: Direction De La Santé Publique Du Bas-Saint-Laurent. Centre Intégré De Santé Et De Services Sociaux Du Bas-Saint-Laurent (2023). Available online at: https://trocbsl.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Sante-et-adaptation-aux-changements-climatiques-au-Bas-Saint-Laurent-CISSSBSL-2023.pdf (Accessed October 16, 2025).
80.
ThiamDCampagnéGLaroseL. Évaluation des risques à la santé liés aux changements climatiques pour la région de l’Outaouais (VRAC). In: Direction De La Santé Publique De L’Outaouais. Gatineau: Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de l’Outaouais (2025). Available online at: https://cisss-outaouais.gouv.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Rapport-VRAC.pdf (Accessed June 22, 2026).
81.
St-GermainFRainvilleL-C. Les vulnérabilités climatiques projetées pour 2050 en Gaspésie et aux Îles-de-la-Madeleine. In: Direction De Santé Publique Gaspésie–Îles-de-la-Madeleine (2023). Available online at: https://cisss-gaspesie.gouv.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Les-vulnerabilites-climatiques-projetees-pour-2050-en-Gaspesie-et-aux-Iles-de-la-Madeleine-1.pdf (Accessed June 24, 2026).
82.
CIUSSS de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec. Prévention et Intervention en cas de Chaleur Pour les Centres D’Hébergement et de Soins De Longue Durée (CHSLD), Les Ressources Non Institutionnelles (RNI) Et Les Résidences Privées Pour Aînés (RPA). CIUSSS de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (2019). Available online at: https://ciusssmcq.ca/telechargement/996/pro-13-003-prevention-et-intervention-en-cas-de-chaleur-pour-les-centres-d-heber (Accessed November 24, 2025).
83.
PinsonneaultCMartinHBlanchardYBoucherADodelerCMorrierGet alPréparer La Réponse Aux Sinistres: Guide À L’Intention Du Milieu Municipal Pour L’Établissement D’Une Préparation Adaptée Aux Vagues De Chaleur Extrêmes, Pour La Région Du Bas-Saint-Laurent. Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux du Bas-Saint-Laurent (2023). Available online at: https://www.cisss-bsl.gouv.qc.ca/sites/default/files/fichier/2023-07-04_guide-reference-chaleur-extreme_final.pdf (Accessed March 21, 2024).
84.
Ontario Public Health Emergencies Science Advisory Committee. Seasonal Bulletin: Interim Recommendations for Ontario’s Heat Alert and Response System. Toronto, ON: Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion Public Health Ontario (2023). Available online at: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/O/2023/ophesac-recommendations-ontario-heat-alert-response-system.pdf?rev=071844c0d27a4e5b9e46d1b3abc16b5a&sc_lang=en (Accessed May 21, 2026).
85.
Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). Rapid Review: Addressing heat-related Harms Among Vulnerable Populations. Toronto, ON: Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion Public Health Ontario (2023). Available online at: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/H/2023/heat-related-harms-vulnerable-populations.pdf?rev=54551990bbd44c9faa6dd898c58b29bb&sc_lang=en (Accessed May 21, 2026).
86.
LubikAMcKeeGChenTKosatskyT. Municipal Heat Response Planning in British Columbia, Canada. British Columbia: BC Centre for Disease Control (2017). Available online at: https://www.bccdc.ca/resource-gallery/Documents/Guidelines%20and%20Forms/Guidelines%20and%20Manuals/Health-Environment/BC%20Municipal%20Heat%20Response%20Planning.pdf (Accessed January 27, 2026).
87.
DeeganHEGreenJEl KurdiSAllenMPollockSL. Development and implementation of a heat alert and response system in rural British Columbia. Can J Public Health (2022) 113:446–54. 10.17269/s41997-022-00611-1
88.
SandersonR. Climate Change and Health in Northern Ontario: An Overview of the Health Impacts of Climate Change in Northern Ontario. Northwestern Health Unit (2022). Available online at: https://www.nwhu.on.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Climate-Change-and-Health-in-Northern-Ontario-August-2022.pdf (Accessed November 12, 2025).
89.
CISSS des Laurentides. Lan Régional En Cas De Chaleur Extrême. CISSS des Laurentides (2019). Available online at: https://www.santelaurentides.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/internet/cisss_laurentides/Sante_Publique/Environnement/Chaleur_accablante/Plan_Regional_Chaleur_Extreme_Laurentides_2019_-_VF_-_2019-06-20.pdf (Accessed November 24, 2025).
90.
CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale. Premier Projet De Verdissement Du CIUSSS De La Capitale-Nationale. CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale (2018). Available online at: https://www.ciusss-capitalenationale.gouv.qc.ca/sites/d8/files/docs/Actualit%C3%A9s/Communiqu%C3%A9s/fiche-verdissement-4.pdf (Accessed November 24, 2025).
91.
Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie. Chaleur extrême: boîte à outils. In: Centre Intégré Universitaire De Santé Et De Services Sociaux De L’Estrie. Available online at: https://www.santeestrie.qc.ca/soins-services/conseils-sante/environnement-sains-securitaires/chaleur-extreme/municipalites (Accessed December 9, 2025).
92.
AustinSEFordJDBerrang-FordLBiesbroekRTosunJRossNA. Intergovernmental relations for public health adaptation to climate change in the federalist states of Canada and Germany. Glob Environ Change (2018) 52:226–37. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.010
93.
Health Canada. HealthADAPT (2020). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/health-adapt.html (Accessed November 24, 2025).
94.
KleinKKaraT. Heat response planning for Southern interior B.C. communities: a toolkit. Interior Health. Available online at: https://www.interiorhealth.ca/sites/default/files/PDFS/heat-alert-response-planning-toolkit.pdf (Accessed May 27, 2026).
95.
Health Canada. HealthADAPT and Heatadapt. Government of Canada (2026). Available online at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2026/06/healthadapt-and-heatadapt.html (Accessed June 25, 2026).
96.
GosselinCKosatskyTFournierMRichardLPinardMKingNet alÉvaluation de la Campagne D’Éducation Sur Les Risques À la Santé Reliés Aux Épisodes de Chaleur Accablante et Sur Les Mesures À Prendre Pour Se Protéger. Montréal: Direction de santé publique, Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal (2009). Available online at: http://www.santecom.qc.ca/bibliothequevirtuelle/hyperion/9782894948217.pdf (Accessed October 16, 2025)
97.
PriceKBenmarhniaTGaudetJKaiserDSadoineMLPerronSet alThe Montreal heat response plan: evaluation of its implementation towards healthcare professionals and vulnerable populations. Can J Public Health (2018) 109:108–16. 10.17269/s41997-018-0020-2
98.
BenmarhniaTAlexanderSPriceKSmargiassiAKingNKaufmanJ. The heterogeneity of vulnerability in public health: a heat wave action plan as a case study. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH (2018) 28:619–25. 10.1080/09581596.2017.1322176
99.
BenmarhniaTBaileyZKaiserDAugerNKingNKaufmanJS. A difference-in-differences approach to assess the effect of a heat action plan on heat-related mortality, and differences in effectiveness according to sex, age, and socioeconomic status (Montreal, Quebec). Environ Health Perspect (2016) 124:1694–9. 10.1289/EHP203
100.
BustinzaRLebelGDubéM. Évaluation De la Performance des Avertissements de Chaleur Extrême Émis Par le Système SUPREME au Québec de 2010 à 2016. Québec: Institut national de santé publique du Québec (2017). Available online at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/2291_evaluation_performance_avertissement_chaleur_supreme.pdf (Accessed October 16, 2025).
101.
ClemensKKOuédraogoAMLeBVoogtJMacDonaldMStranbergRet alImpact of Ontario’s Harmonized heat warning and information system on emergency department visits for heat-related illness in Ontario, Canada: a population-based time series analysis. Can J Public Health (2022) 113:686–97. 10.17269/s41997-022-00665-1
102.
MehirizK. The effects of attitudes, norms, and perceived control on the adaptation of elderly individuals and individuals with chronic health conditions to heatwaves. BMC Public Health (2024) 24:256. 10.1186/s12889-024-17712-w
103.
TetzlaffEJWagarKEJohnsonSJIGormanMKennyGP. Heat-health messaging in Canada: a review and content analysis of public health authority webpages and resources. Public Health Pract (2025) 9:100576. 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100576
104.
ApantakuGOBuseCGiangASatterfieldTHarrisonM. Navigating risk and resilience: community leader and care provider perspectives on climate change and health in rural British Columbia. J Rural Stud (2026) 124:104125. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104125
105.
BirchallSJKehlerSWeissenbergerS. “Sometimes, I just want to scream”: institutional barriers limiting adaptive capacity and resilience to extreme events. Glob Environ Change (2025) 91:102967. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102967
106.
Union of BC Municipalities. New Funding for Extreme Heat Planning. Union of BC Municipalities (2022). Available online at: https://www.ubcm.ca/about-ubcm/latest-news/new-funding-extreme-heat-planning (Accessed January 21, 2026).
107.
DwyerIJBarrySJEMegiddoIWhiteCJ. Evaluations of heat action plans for reducing the health impacts of extreme heat: methodological developments (2012–2021) and remaining challenges. Int J Biometeorol (2022) 66:1915–27. 10.1007/s00484-022-02326-x
108.
CISSS de Chaudière-Appalaches. Prévention Des Coups de Chaleur Dans Les Milieux de Travail. CISSS de Chaudière-Appalaches. Available online at: https://www.cisssca.com/soins-et-services/prevention-et-conseils-sante/chaleur-extreme/prevention-des-coups-de-chaleur-dans-les-milieux-de-travail (Accessed December 9, 2025).
109.
Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. Il fait très chaud! - précautions à prendre pour les enfants. Ministère de la Santé des Serv sociaux (2013). Available online at: https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/document-000139/?&txt=chaud&msss_valpub&date=DESC (Accessed December 9, 2025).
110.
Eastern Ontario health unit. Children’s Safety. (2025). Eastern Ontario health unit. Available online at: https://eohu.ca/en/heat/children-s-safety (Accessed December 17, 2025).
111.
Public Health Sudbury & Districts. Keeping children safe during hot weather. Public Health Sudbury & Districts (2025). Available online at: https://www.phsd.ca/health-topics-programs/emergencies-being-prepared/extreme-weather/extreme-heat/keeping-children-safe-hot-weather/ (Accessed December 17, 2025).
112.
Vancouver Coastal Health. Extreme Heat (2025). Available online at: https://www.vch.ca/en/extreme-heat (Accessed December 17, 2025).
113.
MachariaCWKiageLM. Conceptualizing heat vulnerability: equity-centered approaches for comprehensive resilience in a changing climate. Nat Hazards (2024) 120:6923–41. 10.1007/s11069-024-06440-4
114.
PetersMDGodfreyCMcInerneyPMunnZTriccoACKhalilH. In: AromatarisEMunnZ, editors. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. JBI (2020). 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12
Summary
Keywords
Canada, climate change, extreme heat, heat response, public health
Citation
Seabrook MSS, Umar I, Simpson S, Ayala AP, Xie EC, Zhao QJ and Allin S (2026) Public health action on extreme heat in three Canadian provinces: a scoping review. Public Health Rev. 47:1609625. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2026.1609625
Received
30 January 2026
Revised
26 June 2026
Accepted
06 July 2026
Published
31 July 2026
Volume
47 - 2026
Edited by
Peter Francis Raguindin, University of Lucerne, Switzerland
Reviewed by
Two reviewers who chose to remain anonymous
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Seabrook, Umar, Simpson, Ayala, Xie, Zhao and Allin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. PHR is edited by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) in a partnership with the Association of Schools of Public Health of the European Region (ASPHER)+
*Correspondence: Mélanie S. S. Seabrook, melanie.seabrook@mail.utoronto.ca; Sara Allin, sara.allin@utoronto.ca
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.