Skip to main content

YOUNG RESEARCHER EDITORIAL

Int J Public Health, 03 November 2022

Strengthening the National Care System for Young Onset Dementia

  • 1Obu Center for Dementia Care Research and Practices, Obu, Japan
  • 2Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

The IJPH series “Young Researcher Editorial” is a training project of the Swiss School of Public Health.

In our rapidly aging societies, developing a sustainable integrated care system for dementia is a critical health challenge. Dementia is a syndrome of cognitive deterioration caused by diseases or injuries (1, 2), and we tend to assume that people living with dementia are elderly, frail, or lack mobility. Young-onset dementia (YOD) (3) is less common, but not truly rare. A recent meta-analysis revealed that the worldwide age-standardized prevalence of YOD for people aged between 30 and 64 was about 119.0 per 100,000, which was considered to be higher than previously expected (4). Diagnosis of YOD is often delayed, preventing people living with YOD and their families from receiving appropriate care (5). They lose more lifetime income and have higher health costs because they must depend on chronic care for most of their lives. Therefore, we argue that a system of care should be formed to effectively support people living with YOD on their complex journey.

Some countries are focusing on care for YOD as well as dementia in the elderly (6, 7). Japan has designed policies and made practical guidelines for people living with YOD. There, a national project for people living with dementia has encouraged local governments to coordinate practices for YOD care. However, what type of care is best for people living with YOD and their families? Support systems may vary across countries, according to local situations and the needs of users.

In Japan, a YOD coordinator answers questions and acts as the hub for contact with people living with YOD, their families, caregivers, or health professionals. There are YOD coordinators in every prefecture (the area of local government) and some large cities. They provide support, information, and advice in the living community. The local government may commission appropriate staff in diverse facilities by selecting those capable of contributing to YOD care in the community. In each community, the YOD coordinators are responsible for: 1) providing information or organizing links between support personnel, 2) developing the collaborative support network in the community, and 3) planning activities to improve community care. YOD coordinators must connect the people living with YOD to services in the community. Given this background of the system, YOD coordinators consider the needs of people living with YOD and coordinate their access to services.

Similar care systems have been adopted in a few other countries, including Netherlands, which takes a hub-and-spoke approach (8), and Australia, which provides care through the country’s National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) (9). Unlike other countries that do not have a YOD specialized care system, these countries have set up common regional service hubs at the local level. Netherlands has a long-established YOD care system in which national and regional centers play key roles in educating and training people living with YOD. The Dutch government recognized the need for YOD care and may further develop regional centers. Australia set up YOD key workers as service coordinators for community care, but abolished it in 2019, so now people living with YOD access care through the NDIS, which is available to people with severe and permanent disabilities at the local level (10).

Netherlands, Australia, and Japan have community hubs for YOD care in common, but they differ in whether they specialize in the disease of YOD. Japan and Netherlands have specialized service hubs for YOD, but Australia has inclusive service hubs accessible for all people with disabilities including people living with YOD. This difference may be the result of the flexibility of each country’s social welfare policy to address the care of YOD.

All countries must meet the common challenges of YOD care and provide needs-oriented and age-appropriate services. Currently, most services do not fit the needs of people living with YOD and their families due to the deferential needs of those who suffer in advanced age (11). Some people living with YOD need access to resources that help them reacquire meaningful roles and be re-employed for jobs. Tailored YOD services could provide one-stop support, and work in the aforementioned countries. To form an effective service system, YOD care should be integrated YOD specialized services into the existing government systems. Through the specialized care service, people living with YOD and their families may lead to meaningful engagement and increase their satisfaction with care.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Livingston, G, Huntley, J, Sommerlad, A, Ames, D, Ballard, C, Banerjee, S, et al. Dementia Prevention, Intervention, and Care: 2020 Report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet (2020) 396:413–46. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30367-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2.World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on the Public Health Response to Dementia 2017–2025. Geneva: World Health Organization (2017). p. 44p.

Google Scholar

3. Van de Veen, D, Bakker, C, Peetoom, K, Pijnenburg, Y, Papma, JM, de Vugt, M, et al. An Integrative Literature Review on the Nomenclature and Definition of Dementia at a Young Age. J Alzheimers Dis (2021) 83:1891–916. doi:10.3233/jad-210458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Hendriks, S, Peetoom, K, Bakker, C, van der Flier, WM, Papma, JM, Koopmans, R, et al. Global Prevalence of Young-Onset Dementia A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Neurol (2021) 78:1080–90. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Van Vliet, D, de Vugt, ME, Bakker, C, Pijnenburg, YAL, Vernooij-Dassen, M, Koopmans, R, et al. Time to Diagnosis in Young-Onset Dementia as Compared with Late-Onset Dementia. Psychol Med (2013) 43:423–32. doi:10.1017/S0033291712001122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6.Alzheimer’s Disease International. From Plan to Impact IV: Progress towards Targets of the WHO Global Action Plan on Dementia. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International (2021). p. 75p.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Jones, B, Gage, H, Bakker, C, Barrios, H, Boucault, S, Mayer, J, et al. Availability of Information on Young Onset Dementia for Patients and Carers in Six European Countries. Patient Educ Couns (2018) 101:159–65. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bakker, C, Verboom, M, and Koopmans, R. Reimagining Postdiagnostic Care and Support in Young-Onset Dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc (2022) 23:261–5. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sansoni, J, Duncan, C, Grootemaat, P, Capell, J, Samsa, P, and Westera, A. Younger Onset Dementia: A Review of the Literature to Inform Service Development. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen (2016) 31:693–705. doi:10.1177/1533317515619481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Cations, M, Loi, SM, Draper, B, Swaffer, K, Velakoulis, D, Goh, AMY, et al. A Call to Action for the Improved Identification, Diagnosis, Treatment and Care of People with Young Onset Dementia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry (2021) 55:837–40. doi:10.1177/00048674211037542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Cations, M, Withall, A, Horsfall, R, Denham, N, White, F, Trollor, J, et al. Why Aren't People with Young Onset Dementia and Their Supporters Using Formal Services? Results from the INSPIRED Study. Plos One (2017) 12:e0180935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dementia, care, public policy, young onset dementia, coordination

Citation: Kogata T (2022) Strengthening the National Care System for Young Onset Dementia. Int J Public Health 67:1605099. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605099

Received: 01 June 2022; Accepted: 24 October 2022;
Published: 03 November 2022.

Edited by:

Peter Francis Raguindin, University of Bern, Switzerland

Copyright © 2022 Kogata. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tomohiro Kogata, kogata@dcnet.gr.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.