ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Int. J. Public Health, 06 September 2022

Volume 67 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604869

Ethnicity, Child Sex, and the Likelihood of Marriage in Pregnancy: A Novel Analysis of Gender Inequity

  • 1. University of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada

  • 2. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

  • 3. Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada

  • 4. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada

Article metrics

1,2k

Views

435

Downloads

Abstract

Objective: We assessed the association between fetal sex and the likelihood of marriage during pregnancy.

Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 1,334,911 women who were unmarried at conception and had a live birth between 1990 and 2018 in Quebec, Canada. The exposure was fetal sex, determined by ultrasound. The outcome was marriage during pregnancy. We estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of child sex with the likelihood of marriage during pregnancy according to region of origin.

Results: Among women who were unmarried at conception, 13.1% of foreign-born women got married during pregnancy compared with 2.6% of Canadian-born women. Women from the Middle East and North Africa who were pregnant with boys were 1.13 times more likely to marry during pregnancy compared with women who were pregnant with girls (95% CI 1.02–1.26). There was no association among Canadian-born women.

Conclusion: Women from some cultural minorities who are pregnant with boys may be more likely to marry during pregnancy in Western settings. Gender inequality may manifest as a preference for sons that influences the likelihood of marriage.

Introduction

Many unmarried women marry while pregnant, but the sex of the child is an underrecognized factor that may influence the likelihood of marriage. Son preference is common in many cultures and is known to affect prenatal decisions during pregnancy [15]. In some cultures, women who are pregnant with girls opt for sex-selective abortion [15], or in extreme cases, infanticide [3]. Some cultural groups may have more pronounced son preference due to family pressure, cultural and religious traditions, family name propagation, need to protect the marriage, and socioeconomic responsibilities [14, 6]. Because the sex of a child can have a strong influence on the decision to pursue a pregnancy, it is possible that unmarried pregnant women who are carrying boys may be more likely to marry because these pregnancies may be perceived as more valuable.

Marital status and family composition are well-established determinants of maternal and infant health [7, 8]. Unmarried pregnant women have an elevated risk of low birth weight, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age at birth after controlling for ethnicity [7], as well as a higher prevalence of postpartum depression [8]. Children of unmarried or single parents are at risk of obesity, asthma, injury, and hospitalization, as well as behavioural problems and suboptimal cognitive development [9]. Marriage during pregnancy has the potential to improve maternal and child outcomes, but the factors that influence the likelihood of marriage are not understood. Gender inequity is a widely recognized determinant of health [10]. Investigating the association between ethnicity, child sex, and marriage during pregnancy is important because identifying gender inequity in Western settings may be challenging using usual indicators. Marriage during pregnancy is a potential indicator of son preference in Western countries, where gender inequity related to pregnancy is not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between child sex and the likelihood of marriage during pregnancy in a multicultural Western setting where son preference has been documented through sex-selective abortion [11].

Methods

Study Design

We used a retrospective cohort design to study women who were unmarried at the start of pregnancy and had a live birth, girl or boy, any time between 1990 and 2018 in Quebec, Canada. We began the study in 1990 because routine ultrasounds were implemented in Quebec in the early 1990s, allowing parents to determine the sex of their child in the first or second trimester [12].

We acquired information from birth registration certificates. Birth certificates collect data on marital status, date of marriage, country of birth, mother tongue, child sex, and gestational age. We used the mother tongue and country of birth as markers of cultural status. We excluded women who were already married at the time of conception, had infants of undetermined sex, or had missing gestational age, mother tongue, or country of birth.

Exposure

The exposure of interest was child sex, as documented on birth certificates. During the study, parents were covered by publicly funded prenatal healthcare that included ultrasound in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Ultrasound can reliably detect fetal sex towards the end of the first trimester, at around 12 weeks of gestation [13]. Visualization of the sagittal sign at 14 weeks can determine fetal sex with nearly 100% accuracy [13]. Non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA can determine sex as early as 7 weeks [14], although these tests are used less frequently.

In Quebec, women routinely have dating ultrasounds at 11–13 weeks and birth defect screening ultrasounds at 18–22 weeks [15, 16]. The majority of women are informed of the sex of their child during ultrasound. The proportion of women who refuse to know the sex, or ultrasound technicians who fail to visualize the sagittal sign or external genitalia, is expected to be low.

Outcome

The outcome was marriage during pregnancy. We had the exact date of marriage, as well as the date and gestational age at birth. We estimated the conception date by subtracting the gestational age from the date of birth and determined the number of days between conception and the date of marriage. Follow-up began at conception and ended at the time of marriage or birth. We censored all women who did not marry before the birth of their child.

Covariates

We considered cultural factors that could modify the relationship between child sex and the likelihood of marriage. We used country of birth and mother tongue as indicators of culture in this analysis. Previous studies indicate that both country of birth and language are associated with perinatal outcomes in Quebec [17, 18].

We classified country of birth following World Bank regions [11], including Middle East and North Africa, East Europe, South Asia, East Asia and the Pacific, West Europe and the US, Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Canada. As Quebec is a Francophone province with minority Anglophone and foreign-language populations, we classified women as having French, English, or a foreign mother tongue. We grouped all foreign languages and also analyzed linguistic groups separately. We used French and English as the comparison group because these two linguistic populations share cultural characteristics. Son preference is not prominent among Francophones or Anglophones in Quebec, and a large proportion of both live as common-law couples without formally marrying [19].

We accounted for confounders such as age at delivery (<25, 25–34, ≥35 years), primiparity, and education (no high school diploma, high school diploma or postsecondary training, university degree, unknown). Age at delivery, primiparity, and education were collected by self-report in birth certificates. Because such factors can be linked with cultural status but not the sex of a child at conception, we included these covariates as confounders of the association between cultural status and marriage, but not child sex and marriage. We did not have data on the use of sex-selective abortion. However, we stratified analyses by cultural groups where sex-selective abortion has been documented [3]. Previous analyses of Quebec data indicate that mothers of Indo-Pakistani descent had a higher sex ratio than expected in the past, suggesting the possibility of sex selective abortion [11].

Data Analysis

We computed marriage rates stratified by region of origin and mother tongue and plotted the cumulative percentage by gestational age. In primary analyses, we used Cox regression to obtain hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of cultural group with the probability of marriage during pregnancy. We adjusted these models for age at delivery, parity, and education. We subsequently used Cox regression to estimate the association between child sex and the probability of marriage in each region of origin and language group separately.

We examined the association of child sex with marriage anytime during pregnancy, beginning follow-up at conception and ending at marriage (event) or delivery (censored). Because ultrasound is less reliable at determining sex before 12 weeks, we expected that child sex would be more weakly associated with marriage before this time point. We also expected stronger associations after the second trimester ultrasound at 18 or 22 weeks when a larger proportion of women would know the child’s sex. We therefore performed analyses in which we stopped follow-up at 12 weeks, and analyses in which follow-up began at 12, 18, and 22 weeks of pregnancy.

In sensitivity analyses, we assessed whether associations differed when we restricted the analysis to the first pregnancy only. We also stratified the analysis by period (1990–1999, 2000–2009, 2010–2018), as new technologies may have facilitated earlier determination of sex over time and secular trends in son preference may have changed during the 30-year study period. We analyzed the data using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). As the data were anonymous, consent to participate was not required. The institutional review board of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre waived ethics review.

Results

There were 1,334,911 women who were unmarried at the start of pregnancy, including 45,842 women with a foreign mother tongue and 80,295 women whose region of origin was outside of Canada (Table 1). Overall, only 2.8% of French and English speakers got married during pregnancy, compared with 15.9% of women with a foreign mother tongue. Similarly, only 2.6% of Canadian-born women got married during pregnancy. In contrast, between 8.7% and 30.3% of foreign-born women got married during pregnancy. Marriage during pregnancy was most frequent among women from the Middle East and North Africa (30.3%). Women with a foreign language were more likely to be ≥ 35 years and have no high school diploma compared with French and English-speaking women (Table 2).

TABLE 1

No. women who married during pregnancy (%) Total no. women Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)
Unadjusted Adjusteda
All women 42,899 (3.2) 1,334,911
Mother tongue
 Foreign language 7,304 (15.9) 45,842 6.16 (6.01–6.32) 6.31 (6.16–6.48)
 French or English 35,595 (2.8) 1,289,069 Reference Reference
Region of origin
 Middle East and North Africa 1,351 (30.3) 4,457 13.73 (13.00–14.50) 12.62 (11.94–13.34)
 Eastern Europe 1,000 (21.0) 4,755 8.80 (8.26–9.37) 7.52 (7.06–8.01)
 South Asia 291 (23.8) 1,225 10.35 (9.22–11.62) 11.47 (10.22–12.87)
 East Asia and Pacific 1,739 (18.6) 9,355 7.80 (7.44–8.19) 7.66 (7.29–8.04)
 West Europe and United States 1,701 (9.4) 18,085 3.75 (3.57–3.93) 3.30 (3.14–3.46)
 Sub-Saharan Africa 1,036 (12.1) 8,560 4.91 (4.62–5.23) 4.86 (4.57–5.17)
 Latin America 1,556 (12.1) 12,916 4.87 (4.63–5.12) 5.08 (4.82–5.34)
 Caribbean 1,815 (8.7) 20,942 3.47 (3.31–3.63) 3.94 (3.76–4.14)
 Canada 32,410 (2.6) 1,254,616 Reference Reference

Association of mother tongue and region of birth with marriage during pregnancy, Canada, 1990–2018.

a

Adjusted for age at delivery, parity, and education.

TABLE 2

No. women (%) N = 1,334,911
Age at delivery Education
<25 years 25–34 years ≥35 years No high school diploma High school diploma or postsecondary training University training
Mother tongue
 Foreign language 11,646 (25.4) 24,167 (52.7) 10,029 (21.9) 8,040 (17.5) 23,894 (52.1) 10,774 (23.5)
 French or English 347,147 (26.9) 800,775 (62.1) 141,147 (10.9) 152,712 (11.8) 740,636 (57.5) 337,700 (26.2)
Region of origin
 Middle East and North Africa 616 (13.8) 2,382 (53.4) 1,459 (32.7) 319 (7.2) 1,733 (38.9) 1,906 (42.8)
 East Europe 899 (18.9) 2,648 (55.7) 1,208 (25.4) 245 (5.2) 1,922 (40.4) 2,292 (48.2)
 South Asia 325 (26.5) 713 (58.2) 187 (15.3) 277 (22.6) 701 (57.2) 147 (12.0)
 East Asia and Pacific 1,532 (16.4) 5,453 (58.3) 2,370 (25.3) 1,437 (15.4) 4,635 (49.5) 2,597 (27.8)
 West Europe and United States 2,489 (13.8) 11,394 (63.0) 4,202 (23.2) 1,041 (5.8) 7,102 (39.3) 9,173 (50.7)
 Sub-Saharan Africa 1,724 (20.1) 5,102 (59.6) 1,734 (20.3) 875 (10.2) 4,191 (49.0) 2,803 (32.7)
 Latin America 3,904 (30.2) 6,511 (50.4) 2,501 (19.4) 2,373 (18.4) 6,875 (53.2) 2,988 (23.1)
 Caribbean 5,667 (27.1) 10,743 (51.3) 4,532 (21.6) 4,454 (21.3) 12,469 (59.5) 2,587 (12.4)
 Canada 341,637 (27.2) 779,996 (62.2) 132,983 (10.6) 149,731 (11.9) 724,902 (57.8) 323,981 (25.8)

Characteristics of women at delivery by mother tongue and region of origin, Canada, 1990–2018.

In adjusted regression models, mother tongue and region of origin were both associated with the probability of marriage regardless of child sex (Table 1). Compared with French and English-speaking women, women with foreign mother tongues were 6.31 times more likely to marry during pregnancy (95% CI 6.16–6.48). Women from all foreign regions of origin were more likely to marry, although associations were stronger for some regions. Women who originated from the Middle East and North Africa were 12.62 times more likely to marry (95% CI 11.94–13.34) and women from South Asia were 11.47 times more likely to marry during pregnancy (95% CI 10.22–12.87), compared with Canadian-born women.

In most cultural groups, there was no clear association between child sex and the overall probability of marriage during pregnancy (Table 3). However, women from the Middle East and North Africa who were pregnant with boys were 1.13 times more likely to marry compared with women from the same region who were pregnant with girls (95% CI 1.02–1.26). Women from Eastern Europe also had a greater tendency to marry when they were pregnant with boys (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.98–1.26).

TABLE 3

Women pregnant with boys Women pregnant with girls Hazard ratio boys vs girls (95% confidence interval)
No. who married during pregnancy (%) Total no. women No. who married during pregnancy (%) Total no. women
All women 22,102 (3.2) 685,067 20,797 (3.2) 649,844 1.01 (0.99–1.03)
Mother tongue
 Foreign language 3,764 (16.2) 23,302 3,540 (15.7) 22,540 1.03 (0.98–1.08)
 French or English 18,338 (2.8) 661,765 17,257 (2.8) 627,304 1.01 (0.99–1.03)
Region of origin
 Middle East and North Africa 735 (31.8) 2,311 616 (28.7) 2,146 1.13 (1.02–1.26)
 Eastern Europe 530 (22.0) 2,407 470 (20.0) 2,348 1.11 (0.98–1.26)
 South Asia 154 (23.9) 645 137 (23.6) 580 1.01 (0.80–1.27)
 East Asia and Pacific 897 (18.7) 4,798 842 (18.5) 4,557 1.02 (0.93–1.12)
 West Europe and United States 878 (9.5) 9,205 823 (9.3) 8,880 1.03 (0.94–1.14)
 Sub-Saharan Africa 523 (12.1) 4,332 513 (12.1) 4,228 0.99 (0.88–1.12)
 Latin America 803 (12.0) 6,680 753 (12.1) 6,236 0.99 (0.90–1.10)
 Caribbean 913 (8.7) 10,511 902 (8.7) 10,431 1.01 (0.92–1.10)
 Canada 16,669 (2.6) 644,178 15,741 (2.6) 610,438 1.00 (0.98–1.03)

Association between child sex and marriage during pregnancy according to mother tongue and region of origin, Canada, 1990–2018.

These patterns became more pronounced when we considered the gestational age and timing of routine ultrasounds that informed parents of the child’s sex (Figure 1). After 18 weeks of gestation, women from the Middle East and North Africa who were pregnant with boys had a higher cumulative frequency of marriage than women who were pregnant with girls. At 22 weeks, the cumulative frequency of marriage was 24.6% (95% CI 22.8–26.4) for women pregnant with boys compared with 20.4% (95% CI 20.3–23.8) for women pregnant with girls. Women from Eastern Europe exhibited similar trends. No such difference was apparent among Canadian-born women.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Cumulative frequency of marriage during pregnancy according to region of origin, Canada, 1990–2018.aSolid line denotes women pregnant with boys; dotted line denotes women pregnant with girls. Solid and dotted lines overlap for women originating from Canada. Gray p value: Middle East and North Africa 0.02; East Europe 0.09; Canada 0.7.

The association between child sex and the probability of marriage strengthened somewhat over the course of the second trimester, when a greater proportion of women likely knew the child’s sex (Table 4). Women from the Middle East and North Africa who were pregnant with boys had 1.11 times the likelihood of marriage after 12 weeks (95% CI 0.95–1.29) and 1.26 times the likelihood of marriage after 18 weeks of pregnancy (95% CI 1.04–1.53), compared with women from the same region who were pregnant with girls. Child sex was not associated with marriage among women from South Asia, East Asia, West Europe and the United States, or Canada at any gestational age.

TABLE 4

No. women who married during pregnancy (%) Hazard ratio boys vs girls (95% confidence interval)
Pregnant with boys N = 22,102 Pregnant with girls N = 20,797
Middle East and North Africa
 <12 weeks 327 (14.2) 262 (12.2) 1.16 (1.00–1.35)
 ≥12 weeks 408 (17.7) 354 (16.5) 1.11 (0.95–1.29)
 ≥18 weeks 267 (11.6) 214 (10.0) 1.26 (1.04–1.53)
 ≥22 weeks 193 (8.4) 149 (6.9) 1.18 (0.94–1.47)
Eastern Europe
 <12 weeks 149 (6.2) 121 (5.2) 1.12 (0.91–1.39)
 ≥12 weeks 381 (15.8) 349 (14.9) 1.11 (0.95–1.29)
 ≥18 weeks 282 (11.7) 241 (10.3) 1.15 (0.96–1.38)
 ≥22 weeks 197 (8.2) 169 (7.2) 1.16 (0.92–1.45)
South Asia
 <12 weeks 61 (9.5) 59 (10.2) 0.94 (0.67–1.31)
 ≥12 weeks 93 (14.4) 78 (13.5) 1.08 (0.79–1.49)
 ≥18 weeks 56 (8.7) 54 (9.3) 0.94 (0.63–1.41)
 ≥22 weeks 39 (6.1) 41 (7.1) 0.99 (0.61–1.60)
East Asia and Pacific
 <12 weeks 337 (7.0) 279 (6.1) 1.12 (0.97–1.30)
 ≥12 weeks 560 (11.7) 563 (12.4) 0.95 (0.84–1.08)
 ≥18 weeks 359 (7.5) 373 (8.2) 0.90 (0.77–1.05)
 ≥22 weeks 264 (5.5) 266 (5.8) 0.93 (0.78–1.12)
West Europe and the US
 <12 weeks 285 (3.1) 261 (2.9) 1.07 (0.92–1.25)
 ≥12 weeks 593 (6.4) 562 (6.3) 1.01 (0.90–1.14)
 ≥18 weeks 401 (4.4) 381 (4.3) 1.10 (0.95–1.28)
 ≥22 weeks 299 (3.3) 272 (3.1) 1.04 (0.87–1.25)
Canada
 <12 weeks 6,635 (1.0) 6,300 (1.0) 1.00 (0.96–1.03)
 ≥12 weeks 10,034 (1.6) 9,441 (1.6) 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
 ≥18 weeks 6,644 (1.0) 6,268 (1.0) 1.02 (0.98–1.06)
 ≥22 weeks 4,613 (0.7) 4,305 (0.7) 1.00 (0.95–1.04)

Association of child sex with gestational age at marriage according to region of origin, Canada, 1990–2018.

Findings were similar when we examined mother tongue (Table 5). Women with any foreign mother tongue who were pregnant with boys were 1.08 times more likely to marry after 18 weeks of gestation (95% CI 1.00–1.16), compared with women who were pregnant with girls. Women with Arabic or other neighbouring mother tongues who were pregnant with boys were 1.32 times more likely to marry after 18 weeks (95% CI 1.04–1.68), compared with women from the same region who were pregnant with girls.

TABLE 5

No. women who married during pregnancy (%) Hazard ratio boys vs girls (95% confidence interval)
Pregnant with boys N = 22,102 Pregnant with girls N = 20,797
Any foreign language
 <12 weeks 1,275 (5.5) 1,239 (5.5) 0.99 (0.92–1.07)
 ≥12 weeks 2,489 (10.7) 2,301 (10.2) 1.06 (0.99–1.12)
 ≥18 weeks 1,701 (7.3) 1,543 (6.9) 1.08 (1.00–1.16)
 ≥22 weeks 1,216 (5.2) 1,072 (4.8) 1.07 (0.98–1.17)
Arabic and neighbouring Afro-asiatic languagesa
 <12 weeks 214 (15.2) 182 (13.5) 1.15 (0.96–1.39)
 ≥12 weeks 252 (17.9) 211 (15.7) 1.17 (0.96–1.42)
 ≥18 weeks 175 (12.4) 136 (10.1) 1.32 (1.04–1.68)
 ≥22 weeks 130 (9.2) 93 (6.9) 1.32 (1.00–1.75)
Russian and Slavic languagesb
 <12 weeks 115 (6.4) 95 (5.5) 1.12 (0.88–1.43)
 ≥12 weeks 295 (16.5) 279 (16.1) 1.05 (0.89–1.25)
 ≥18 weeks 218 (12.2) 197 (11.4) 1.05 (0.86–1.29)
 ≥22 weeks 147 (8.2) 139 (8.0) 1.05 (0.81–1.36)
Indo-Pakistani, Chinese, and related languagesc
 <12 weeks 323 (7.6) 307 (7.3) 0.99 (0.85–1.14)
 ≥12 weeks 550 (12.9) 542 (13.0) 1.03 (0.91–1.17)
 ≥18 weeks 366 (8.6) 354 (8.5) 1.00 (0.85–1.17)
 ≥22 weeks 263 (6.2) 256 (6.1) 1.02 (0.84–1.22)
French or English
 <12 weeks 7,252 (1.1) 6,797 (1.1) 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
 ≥12 weeks 11,086 (1.7) 10,460 (1.7) 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
 ≥18 weeks 7,347 (1.1) 6,992 (1.1) 1.01 (0.98–1.05)
 ≥22 weeks 5,147 (0.8) 4,833 (0.8) 0.99 (0.95–1.04)

Association of child sex with gestational age at marriage according to mother tongue, Canada, 1990–2018.

a

Turkish, Egyptian, and other languages of Southwest Asia and North Africa.

b

Czech, Estonian, Lettish, Lithuanian, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Ukrainian, Yugoslav.

c

Japanese, and other languages of Southeast Asia.

Restricting the analysis to primiparous women led to similar results although confidence intervals widened. There was no evidence of a change in associations over time.

Discussion

In this study of 1.3 million women who were unmarried at conception, women originating from the Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe who were pregnant with boys were more likely to marry during pregnancy than women who were pregnant with girls. The associations strengthened during the second trimester, when ultrasounds can more reliably detect the sex of the child. Child sex was not associated with the likelihood of marriage in women originating from Canada, West Europe and the United States, Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean. These findings suggest that child sex among some cultural minorities may influence the likelihood of marriage during pregnancy. Marital status is a well-known determinant of maternal and infant health, and marriage during pregnancy may be an indicator of son preference and gender inequity that merits more attention in epidemiologic research [7, 8].

Gender inequity in maternal and child health is challenging to measure in Western settings. While many studies have examined sex and gender differences in physical and mental health [10, 20], gender inequity related to pregnancy and birth outcomes receives less attention. Most indicators of gender inequity rely on gross measures such as the World Health Organization gender inequality index (GII) and gender empowerment measure (GEM) which are based on education, income, professional positions, and political participation [21]. The GEM has a reproductive health component, but only includes maternal mortality ratios and adolescent birth rates [21]. In Quebec, gender inequity is measured by lower income and employment rates, and fewer women in leadership positions compared with men [22]. These indicators are difficult to adapt to reproductive health.

Much of the literature on gender inequity during pregnancy focuses on sex selection. Several studies have shown that countries such as India, China, South Korea, Azerbaijan, and Armenia have more than the expected 105 male births for every 100 female births [35]. These high sex ratios have been attributed to sex-selective abortion of female fetuses. There also is evidence that sex selection is practised among immigrant populations in Western countries [1, 2, 11]. In the 1990s, women of Indo-Pakistani descent in Quebec had a considerably elevated number of male births thought to be due to sex selection [11]. In settings where son preference has been documented, studies have shown that pregnant women who are expecting girls receive less prenatal care [23], and that girls are breastfed for a shorter period than boys [5].

In this study, women from selected cultural minorities, including the Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe, had a greater likelihood of marriage if they were expecting boys. While very little literature is available on this form of gender inequity, two studies from the United States assessed marital inequality without examining differences between cultural groups [24, 25]. Women who were carrying boys were more likely to marry during pregnancy than women carrying girls, but only if they had an ultrasound during pregnancy [24]. Similarly, unmarried women who gave birth to boys were more likely to marry the child’s biological father after pregnancy than women who gave birth to girls [25]. Other research suggests that men in the United States are more likely to live with their children and less likely to divorce if they have sons [24], and that having a firstborn daughter increases the probability of living without a father [26].

Son preference is known to be influenced by cultural, religious, and societal factors [1, 2]. Some religions, including Islam, Christianity, and Jainism, limit the practice of abortion [1, 2, 6]. In communities with taboos against abortion, sex ratios at birth may not be good indicators of gender inequity or son preference because sex-selective abortions may be less accessible. Son preference may instead manifest as differences in prenatal and postnatal care, probability of having additional children, or family structure [1, 2]. This tendency may explain why we found a higher likelihood of marriage among women carrying boys from the Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe—regions with large Islamic and Christian communities where abortions are less practiced [6, 27]. We found no such trend among women of South or East Asian origin, including China and India where son preference and sex-selective abortion have been documented [1, 5].

A growing body of literature suggests that marriage is beneficial to maternal and child health. Relative to unmarried women, married women have 32% lower risk of low birth weight, 18% lower risk of preterm birth, and 31% lower risk of small-for-gestational age birth [7]. The benefits appear to continue through childhood [9, 24, 28, 29]. Although children whose parents are in stable cohabitation also have better outcomes than children of single parents, the benefits are not as pronounced compared with married parents [9, 24]. Marriage increases the availability of resources, mental health, relationship quality, parenting quality, paternal involvement, and family stability [9, 30]. Marriage is associated with better cognitive performance and lower risk of behavioural problems, obesity, asthma, injury, and child hospitalization [9, 24, 28, 29]. A lower likelihood of marriage among women who are carrying girls may therefore have long-term implications for the health and development of daughters [9, 24, 25]. Attention to reducing sex-based disparities in marriage has potential to improve the health of children, especially daughters.

Limitations

This study has limitations. We used an administrative registry where errors in the coding of exposures or outcomes cannot be ruled out. Mother tongue, country of origin, and date of marriage were self-reported and may be misclassified, possibly attenuating the results toward the null. Grouping diverse countries into broad regions of origin may have masked smaller cultural differences. We were unable to confirm that parents knew the sex of the child, or the exact gestational age at which sex was determined. Nondifferential misclassification of exposure is expected to bias associations towards the null. We did not know if the proportion of women who refused to know the sex of the child varied by region of origin. We lacked data on the reason for marriage, religion, residency status, duration of residence, and paternal region of origin. We could not account for sex-selective abortions that may have reduced the number of girls born during the study period. The conclusions may not generalize to settings where routine ultrasound is not used or to populations with considerably different characteristics or cultural norms.

Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort study of women who were unmarried at the start of pregnancy, child sex was associated with the probability of marriage among several cultural minorities in a large Canadian province. Women from the Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe who were carrying boys were more likely to marry during pregnancy than women who were carrying girls. The association was present throughout the pregnancy, particularly the second trimester when ultrasounds can inform parents of the sex of their child. The results suggest that child sex among some cultural minorities may influence the likelihood of marriage during pregnancy. Future studies should consider using marriage during pregnancy as an indicator of son preference. Careful thought should be given to developing other novel indicators and ways of measuring gender inequity in the immediate future.

Statements

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the participants or their legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

NA and MB-B: conceived and designed the study. MB-B and SK: analyzed the data, and NA, CB-F, and AD: interpreted the results. SK: reviewed the literature. NA and CB-F: wrote the manuscript and MB-B, SK, and AD: reviewed it for critical intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé [award number 296785].

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    Puri S Adams V Ivey S Nachtigall RD . There Is Such a Thing as Too Many Daughters, but Not Too Many Sons”: A Qualitative Study of Son Preference and Fetal Sex Selection Among Indian Immigrants in the United States. Soc Sci Med (2011) 72:116976. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.027

  • 2

    Almond D Edlund L Milligan K . Son Preference and the Persistence of Culture: Evidence from South and East Asian Immigrants to Canada. Popul Dev Rev (2013) 39:7595. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00574.x

  • 3

    Hesketh T Xing ZW . Abnormal Sex Ratios in Human Populations: Causes and Consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 103:132715. 10.1073/pnas.0602203103

  • 4

    Guilmoto CZ Duthé G . Masculinization of Births in Eastern Europe. Popul Societes (2013) 506:14. 10.3917/popsoc.506.0001

  • 5

    Graham MJ Larsen U Xu X . Son Preference in Anhui Province, China. Int Fam Plan Perspect (1998) 24:727. 10.2307/2991929

  • 6

    El Gilany AH Shady E . Determinants and Causes of Son Preference Among Women Delivering in Mansoura, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J (2007) 13:11928.

  • 7

    Shah PS Zao J Ali S . Maternal Marital Status and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Matern Child Health J (2011) 15:1097109. 10.1007/s10995-010-0654-z

  • 8

    Urquia ML O’Campo PJ Ray JG . Marital Status, Duration of Cohabitation, and Psychosocial Well-Being Among Childbearing Women: A Canadian Nationwide Survey. Am J Public Health (2013) 103:e815. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301116

  • 9

    Waldfogel J Craigie T-A Brooks-Gunn J . Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing. Future Child (2010) 20:87112. 10.1353/foc.2010.0002

  • 10

    Gupta GR Oomman N Grown C Conn K Hawkes S Shawar YR et al Gender Equality and Gender Norms: Framing the Opportunities for Health. Lancet (2019) 393:255062. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30651-8

  • 11

    Auger N Daniel M Moore S . Sex Ratio Patterns According to Asian Ethnicity in Québec, 1981-2004. Eur J Epidemiol (2009) 24:1724. 10.1007/s10654-008-9307-6

  • 12

    Kramer MS Platt R Yang H Joseph KS Wen SW Morin L et al Secular Trends in Preterm Birth: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study. JAMA (1998) 280:184954. 10.1001/jama.280.21.1849

  • 13

    Odeh M Granin V Kais M Ophir E Bornstein J . Sonographic Fetal Sex Determination. Obstet Gynecol Surv (2009) 64:507. 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318193299b

  • 14

    Devaney SA Palomaki GE Scott JA Bianchi DW . Noninvasive Fetal Sex Determination Using Cell-free Fetal DNA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA (2011) 306:62736. 10.1001/jama.2011.1114

  • 15

    National Public Health Institute of Quebec. Pregnancy. In: From Tiny Tot to Toddler (2021). Available at: https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/mieux-vivre/pdf/tt2021_s1_pregnancy.pdf (Accessed January 14, 2021).

  • 16

    Cargill Y Morin L . No. 223-Content of a Complete Routine Second Trimester Obstetrical Ultrasound Examination and Report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can (2017) 39:e1449. 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.04.022

  • 17

    Auger N Chery M Daniel M . Rising Disparities in Severe Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Haitians in Québec, Canada, 1981-2006. J Immigr Minor Health (2012) 14:198208. 10.1007/s10903-011-9460-y

  • 18

    Auger N Racape J Raynault M-F Bilodeau-Bertrand M Lee GE Janevic T . Stillbirth Among Arab Women in Canada, 1981-2015. Public Health Rep (2020) 135:24552. 10.1177/0033354919900894

  • 19

    Statistical Institute of Quebec. Marriages in Quebec in 2019 (2020). Available at: https://statistique.quebec.ca/fr/fichier/les-mariages-au-quebec-en-2019.pdf (Accessed January 14, 2021).

  • 20

    Denton M Prus S Walters V . Gender Differences in Health: A Canadian Study of the Psychosocial, Structural and Behavioural Determinants of Health. Soc Sci Med (2004) 58:2585600. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.008

  • 21

    Klugman J . Human Development Report 2010 – 20th Anniversary Edition. In: The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network (2010). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2294686.

  • 22

    Tamambang L Auger N Lo E Raynault M-F . Measurement of Gender Inequality in Neighbourhoods of Québec, Canada. Int J Equity Health (2011) 10:52. 10.1186/1475-9276-10-52

  • 23

    Bharadwaj P Lakdawala LK . Discrimination Begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments. J Hum Resour (2013) 48:71113. 10.1353/jhr.2013.0004

  • 24

    Dahl GB Moretti E . The Demand for Sons: Evidence from Divorce, Fertility, and Shotgun Marriage. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (2004). p. 70. 10.3386/w10281

  • 25

    Lundberg S Rose E . Child Gender and the Transition to Marriage. Demography (2003) 40:33349. 10.1353/dem.2003.0015

  • 26

    Blau FD Kahn LM Brummund P Cook J Larson-Koester M . Is There Still Son Preference in the United States?J Popul Econ (2020) 33:70950. 10.1007/s00148-019-00760-7

  • 27

    Myck M Oczkowska M Wowczko I . Gender Preferences in Central and Eastern Europe as Reflected in Partnership and Fertility Outcomes. Bonn, Germany: IZA Institute of Labor Economics (2021). p. 32.

  • 28

    Harknett K . Why Are Children with Married Parents Healthier? The Case of Pediatric Asthma. Popul Res Pol Rev (2009) 28:34765. 10.1007/s11113-008-9102-9

  • 29

    Bzostek SH Beck AN . Familial Instability and Young Children’s Physical Health. Soc Sci Med (2011) 73:28292. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.014

  • 30

    Brown SL . Marriage and Child Well-Being: Research and Policy Perspectives. J Marriage Fam (2010) 72:105977. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00750.x

Summary

Keywords

pregnancy, cultural minorities, gender inequity, marriage, son preference

Citation

Auger N, Bolster-Foucault C, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Khademi S and Djeha A (2022) Ethnicity, Child Sex, and the Likelihood of Marriage in Pregnancy: A Novel Analysis of Gender Inequity. Int J Public Health 67:1604869. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604869

Received

24 February 2022

Accepted

11 August 2022

Published

06 September 2022

Volume

67 - 2022

Edited by

Olaf von dem Knesebeck, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

Updates

Copyright

© 2022 Auger, Bolster-Foucault, Bilodeau-Bertrand, Khademi and Djeha.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nathalie Auger,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article