The IJPH series “Young Researcher Editorial” is a training project of the Swiss School of Public Health.
The future of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management may not rest solely on controlling blood sugar but equally on addressing body weight and cardiorenal risk. T2DM has traditionally been managed through lifestyle interventions—such as dietary modification and regular physical activity—and pharmacological therapies including metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin, all primarily aimed at achieving glycemic control. However, with the global obesity crisis—marked by the steadily rising prevalence of overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), now recognized as the second leading preventable cause of death—this glucose-centric strategy is rapidly evolving.
About 85% of individuals with T2DM are overweight or obese [1]. This statistic alone, derived from many epidemiological studies, establishes a strong association but does not prove a causal relationship. People with obesity are up to seven times more likely to develop T2DM than people without obesity; more than 40% of cases can be attributed to excess weight. Visceral fat accumulation triggers insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, the core pathophysiological processes underlying the disease. Obesity is thus not merely a comorbidity, but a fundamental factor associated with T2DM [2].
Paradoxically, weight gain can be exacerbated by some traditional glucose-lowering drugs including sulfonylureas and insulin, reinforcing a vicious cycle between obesity and poor metabolic control [3]. Against this growing global burden - affecting an estimated 589 million adults worldwide and projected to rise substantially by 2050 [4] - the limitations of weight - promoting therapies have highlighted the need for integrated metabolic strategies. In this context, the concept of “diabesity” has emerged, emphasizing the inseparable pathophysiological link between type 2 DM and obesity [3].
In response, novel pharmacotherapies, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have added weight loss to the therapeutic agenda, promoting it from a secondary observation to a recognized co-primary target alongside glycemic and cardiorenal risk reduction [5]. Large outcome trials show these agents not only achieve durable glycemic reductions and meaningful weight loss but also reduce major cardiovascular events and the progression of slow chronic kidney disease [1, 5]. Beyond these clinical outcomes, reorienting diabetes therapy toward weight-inclusive care has broader implications for public health.
Despite their clinical promise, GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2i have limitations. Adverse effects include gastrointestinal intolerance (nausea, vomiting), pancreatitis, and gallbladder disease, and their long-term safety profile is unknown. Sustaining real-world benefits over time is a challenge because the medications are expensive and tolerability issues often lead to treatment discontinuation [6].
Rapid uptake of these agents has created significant access and equity challenges. Liraglutide (Saxenda®) and semaglutide (Wegovy®) are FDA-approved for weight management in overweight and obese individuals without diabetes [7]. In parallel, semaglutide—originally approved for glycemic control in T2DM—has gained widespread off label popularity for cosmetic weight loss among non-diabetic populations [8]. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), GLP-1 RAs can be purchased without a prescription, fueling unregulated use driven by aesthetic goals. Misuse, however, is not confined to LMICs: in high-income countries, telehealth platforms, online pharmacies, and lifestyle clinics have facilitated large-scale off-label prescribing, contributing to shortages observed in 2022–2023. These dynamics threaten prescribing integrity, complicate pharmacovigilance, and exacerbate global inequities [9, 10]. Social media has further amplified demand, with hashtags celebrating cosmetic weight loss garnering millions of views and glorifying rapid reductions while minimizing risks. This paradox—easy availability without prescription in some settings versus prohibitive costs in others—illustrates the fragmented global landscape of diabetes care.
While the scientific achievements behind GLP-1 RAs are extraordinary, their integration into real-world practice must be guided by evidence-informed policies, ethical oversight, and public education. International agencies such as the WHO could help harmonize access through initiatives like the Essential Medicines List, while national authorities must establish reimbursement frameworks, regulate marketing, and enforce prescription-only access. As early-career researchers in pharmacology and public health, we must advocate for regulation that prevents misuse, reimbursement models that prioritize need over profit, and health literacy strategies that counter misinformation. The recent lawsuits over GLP-1 RA adverse effects highlight the urgent need for transparent pharmacovigilance.
In sum, the pharmacological shift in T2DM management is evidence-based and promising, but its success will depend on responsible integration into practice and policy. Prioritizing weight as a co-primary therapeutic goal must go hand in hand with efforts to ensure equitable access, protect patients from exploitation, and safeguard public health. Innovation without access is inequity. Safety without supervision is illusion.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
The author, YS, solely conceived, designed, researched and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
References
1.
LazzaroniEBen NasrMLoretelliCPastoreIPlebaniLLunatiMEet alAnti-Diabetic Drugs and Weight Loss in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Pharmacol Res (2021) 171:105782. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105782
2.
ChenXZhangLChenW. Global, Regional, and National Burdens of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adolescents from 1990 to 2021, with Forecasts to 2030: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Med (2025) 23:48. 10.1186/s12916-025-03890-w
3.
ChawlaRJaggiS. Medical Management of Diabesity. J Assoc Physicians India (2019) 67(12):52–6. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31801332/ (Accessed May 27, 2025).
4.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 11th ed. Brussels (BE): International Diabetes Federation (2025). Available online at: https://diabetesatlas.org/ (Accessed July 1, 2025).
5.
MourougavelouVChowdhuryTA. Management of Hyperglycaemia in People with Obesity. Clin Med (Lond) (2023) 23(4):364–71. 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0135
6.
WhittenR. Saxenda: A New Weight-Loss Drug for Obesity. Nurse Pract (2016) 41(5):18–21.
7.
KnudsenLBLauJ. The Discovery and Development of Liraglutide and Semaglutide. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2019) 10:155. 10.3389/fendo.2019.00155
8.
Bin DayelFFAlanaziRJAlenaziMAAlkhalifahSAlfaifiMAlghadeerSet alEvaluation of Pre-Treatment Assessment of Semaglutide Users: Balancing the Benefits of Weight Loss Vs. Potential Health Consequences. Healthcare (Basel) (2025) 13(15):1827. 10.3390/healthcare13151827
9.
ShukarSZahoorFHayatKSaeedAGillaniAHOmerSet alDrug Shortage: Causes, Impact, and Mitigation Strategies. Front Pharmacol (2021) 12:693426. 10.3389/fphar.2021.693426
10.
ThomsenRWMailhacALøhdeJBPottegårdA. Real-World Evidence on the Utilization, Clinical and Comparative Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects of Newer GLP-1RA-Based Weight-Loss Therapies. Diabetes Obes Metab (2025) 27(Suppl. 2):66–88. 10.1111/dom.16364
Summary
Keywords
diabesity, diabetes mellitus, liraglutide, obesity, semaglutide
Citation
Sar Y (2026) From Glycemic Control to Weight-Centered Therapy: A Paradigm Shift in Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Promise. Int. J. Public Health 71:1608891. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2026.1608891
Received
16 July 2025
Revised
12 January 2026
Accepted
23 February 2026
Published
06 March 2026
Volume
71 - 2026
Edited by
Germán Guerra, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Sar.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yigitcan Sar, ygtcnsar@gmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.